![]() |
why is it when "we" officials work a great game
this topic is from a forum in minnesota....some of the comments are, in my opinion, just plain stupid...but make for entertaining reading. I'm interested to see if any of you have opinions about them.
copy and paste this into your address bar... Minnesota-Scores.net Forum • View topic - Why is it when "We" officials work a great game... |
Quote:
or just click it. |
There is a reference in the thread about officials having a bias against private schools. From my perspective, it is more like private schools have a bias against officials.
|
I'll tell you what, if an official is officiating for glory and recognition, he's in the wrong business, plain and simple.
Of course it's nice to hear compliments, and they come every once in awhile, and usually from the winning team. Sometimes they catch me so off guard, I can't even muster a "thank you". They say that you know a game is well-officiated when you seemingly don't even notice the refs are there. The game has a certain rhythm to it, and the refs are part of that rhythm. If the rhythm is disrupted, that's when people start complaining about the officiating. I know when I've called a good game, and that's all I need. I could care less what the players think. I take pride in getting better as an official. |
I'm working a few days of the home school national tournament like SWMOzebra posted last week. I did three 16U boys games on Tuesday. After all three games, players from both teams came up to us and shook our hands, thanked us for working their game, etc. Coaches were really good, fans really good for the most part. Not all experiences are bad.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
The game of basketball has a rhythm unlike any other game. Baseball is slow, football is too choppy, but basketball has rhythm and flow. What's so wrong about my comments
|
Quote:
"They say that you know a game is well-officiated when you seemingly don't even notice the refs are there." That is just wrong. Many times the officials must take actions which will make them be noticed. That thought is just a myth spread by fanboys. "The game has a certain rhythm to it, and the refs are part of that rhythm. If the rhythm is disrupted, that's when people start complaining about the officiating." Quote:
I'm not even sure what the rhythm of a game even means. But I think you are talking about officials sounding their whistles many times and stopping play. Some games have lots of fouls and/or violations; in order for the game to be officiated properly the officials will have to break the rhythm many times. Stop worrying about noticing officials. Many times they will have to do things which will make them be noticed. Stop worrying about rhythm of the game. If there is a foul then call it. If there is a violation then call it. |
Quote:
The fact of the matter is, if the refs do a good job, then the game will have a much better flow and rhythm. |
Quote:
BTW, Football can constantly move if you have the right teams running the ball and keeping the ball in bounds. Baseball can go very fast if everyone is swinging a pitches or the pitcher is throwing strikes. There are no absolutes in sports and this is why your comments do not show knowledge whom ever they come from. ;) Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
BTW, Football can constantly move if you have the right teams running the ball and keeping the ball in bounds. Baseball can go very fast if everyone is swinging a pitches or the pitcher is throwing strikes. There are no absolutes in sports and this is why your comments do not show knowledge whom ever they come from. ;)
Peace[/QUOTE] If, if, if, if. Look I'm not saying you're wrong, what I'm arguing is that basketball is a more definite flow. There's always exceptions to every rule. We're getting away from the original point of the article though. Officials shouldn't be looking for glory. |
Quote:
Peace |
Did you read the linked thread in the OP? The link was to a thread on a different forum about getting told we do a good job after a game. That is not why I got into officiating, I don't know about you.
|
Quote:
Peace |
I don't know what statement you are referring to...
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peace |
Im confused...did I contradict myself?
|
Quote:
Peace |
I got ya now...just the way you were reposting everything I said made me think I contradicted myself without realizing it
|
Quote:
And if you do not realize it now, you will realize it in the future either through personal experience or observing someone that you will see someone (might be you) put into a situation you did not expect to be in and it will have nothing to do with wanting that "glory" as you put it. What happened to that Ohio official that we have been talking about for the past few days is the very example I am getting at. His name was in the paper all for doing his job and the school put him into a situation that he would not have been in if they just accepted the outcome and not find excuses for their team's failure. And now this guy will forever be known as the official that “should have apologized” for his call. Peace |
I'm not sure why anyone has a desire for "glory" in officiating. There is no glory in it to begin with. Everyone hates you at some point, it just depends on when it is. I don't officiate anything for attention or glory. I do it because I like it and I enjoy the sports I'm calling. The money isn't bad either.
|
Quote:
I have no problem with you disagreeing with my post, everyone has their opinions, which is why I like message boards. What I don't understand is where you are going with that example of the ref in Ohio. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47am. |