Quote:
Quote:
Also looked like the thrower asked for a TO before the last chop. The phantom block call and the overruled travel were unfortunate. But both teams had major brain cramps near the end as well. I'd say the winner feels pretty lucky right now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But the L definitely saw travel first and was clearly right. Both signaled. The T pretty much took over and went to the table without enough of a pause to talk to the L. |
Quote:
Trail has an awfully quick transition from administering the throw-in to covering the play afterwards. Lead, in that case, likely sees everything develop right in front of him. My $0.02 |
Quote:
|
I can't agree that the travel clearly came first. I thought it was a very difficult call with each official having an opposite angle. There was a travel but there was also a foul. Did the foul cause the travel? Very possible. Tough situation.
However, the L is the only officials who made a 5 second count while visibly swiping 4 times. :( |
So the call that we're calling the "phantom foul" by Tennesee against Miss St., okay, we all agree bad call, but what specifically did he do wrong? Looked to me like center/trail made the call, right? Wasn't he just totally straight-lined? Was lead in a position to come in and give information? Should C/T have decided "I'm not sure, so I'm not going to call it..."?
|
This was a good game up till the last minute or so with what everyone has discussed. I thought the crew lacked some serious communication towards the end, especially with the clock issues. It was a good learning lesson, plus a little rough for me because I was getting text messages from friends (non-officials) who were bewildered (and cussing). And this is from people who have no interest in the SEC because we live in Big 12 and Mo Valley areas. (Although, I think the interest was in hoping MSU would lose so Creighton could get in, *SOBBING*)
|
Mississippi St. v. Tennesssee - Last 6 Minutes
YouTube - Mar. 15 - Mississippi St. v. Tennesssee - Last 6 Minutes |
Question on time taken off
Quote:
A. R. 165. After a goal by Team B, Team A has the ball for a throw-in from the end of the playing court from where the goal was made. (1) B1 kicks the ball along the sideline; or (2) B1 kicks the ball along the end line from where the throwin was attempted. RULING: (1) The kick is a floor violation and the ball shall be awarded to Team A at a designated spot nearest to where the violation occurred. (Rule 9-6 and 7-5.1) (2) The floor violation of kicking the ball victimizes Team A. Consequently, Team A shall retain the privilege to the throw-in from anywhere along the end line. (Rule 9-6, 7-5 and 6.a.4) In (1) and (2), the throw-in was not legally completed since the kick is not a legal touch. As a result, the shot clock shall not start. When this situation occurs in the remaining 59.9 seconds of the second half or an extra period, neither the game clock nor the shot clock shall be started because of the violation. Maybe I am missing something, but I noticed this along with all the other violations previously mentioned in the thread and I do believe it was the referee who went to the table in this instance and reset the game clock. By the way, before anyone gets started, I am no troll. I simply enjoy reading rather than posting most times... I akin it to sitting at the feet of learned men and women... Thanks in advance for your feedback... |
I had to leave home with 1:15 on the clock, so I tuned in to the Vol Radio Network. The announcers made me think the referees were there only to cheat TN.
They were definitely hard on Sirmens (sp?). I got home and watched the replay, and it was an ugly mess. But not exactly the way the radio guys called it. Imagine that! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I must have missed that; it certainly looked as if the defender kicked the ball; in retrospect you are probably correct. Unfortunately, I did not TVO the game; it would have been a good teaching point for new officials to analyze all aspects of the play and pick up on the dispositon of the ball for the throw-in. Thanks for the insight. |
And in high school, you would not take the time off either way, nor would you put it back on. I believe the rule is that the clock starts on the touch (as opposed to a legal touch), so a short amount coming off would be acceptable as it is not a timer's error.
Taking it off in high school is impossible, by rule, here because there's no way you can know to take .3 seconds off. |
Ever wonder why you don't ever see the headline "Psychic Wins Lottery"?
Quote:
Tonight, watching a few of my colleagues, two are NCAA Division I offcials, do a state semifinal game, a player tapped the ball on the way up on the opening jump ball. The umpire properly whistled the violation, and had the timekeeper reset the clock to 8:00, it had moved to 7:58. At first I thought, "What?", but then I realized that this was like a kicked ball on the throwin. The tap was illegal, and the clock is supposed to start on a legal tap, thus the clock gets reset . NFHS 5-9-2: If play is started or resumed by a jump, the clock shall be started when the tossed ball is legally touched. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44pm. |