The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Owning the sideline? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/51774-owning-sideline.html)

Adam Fri Feb 20, 2009 02:12pm

A player is always entitled to their spot on the floor; provided they got there legally.

LGP does grants the right to be moving on contact without being responsible for that contact.

just another ref Fri Feb 20, 2009 02:30pm

LGP to me is an overrated term. It is a good example of a little knowledge may be worse than no knowledge at all. A guy sits in the stands for years yelling, "That's a blocking foul! He wasn't set!" Then, he sits next to Padgett at a game one night, and is given a lollipop and a complimentary rule book along with an explanation of Legal Guarding Position. Then, the very next night, B1 is beaten off the dribble by A1, who has a clear path to the basket. As B1 sprints to catch up, A1 sees him out of the corner of his eye and clears out with his inside arm as he goes up for the shot. The guy is outraged and confused. "What? He never had Legal Guarding Position? Where's that Padgett guy?"

Padgett is on the court, reporting the foul, after waving off the basket, which would have sent the game into overtime.

Adam Fri Feb 20, 2009 02:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 581605)
Padgett is on the court, reporting the foul, after waving off the basket, which would have sent the game into overtime.

Whic of course had nothing to do with LGP. :D

just another ref Fri Feb 20, 2009 02:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 581606)
Whic of course had nothing to do with LGP. :D


I know that, and you know that.........but apparently Padgett gave that guy a less than perfect explanation.

Rich Fri Feb 20, 2009 03:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 581607)
I know that, and you know that.........but apparently Padgett gave that guy a less than perfect explanation.

Reading through this thread, the one thing that popped into my head was: Sometimes, you just have to referee.

just another ref Fri Feb 20, 2009 04:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 581635)
Reading through this thread, the one thing that popped into my head was: Sometimes, you just have to referee.

Padgett couldn't have said it better.

Adam Fri Feb 20, 2009 04:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 581663)
Padgett couldn't have said it better.

That describes a long list of things.

fullor30 Fri Feb 20, 2009 06:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 581635)
Reading through this thread, the one thing that popped into my head was: Sometimes, you just have to referee.


Whew....thanks, I was getting lost.

BillyMac Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:58am

Call toll free number before digging.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN (Post 581404)
Smoke 'em if you got 'em.

Isn't that what Michael Phelps said?

Adam Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 581839)
Isn't that what Michael Phelps said?

Not sure, apparently there isn't enough evidence.

BillyMac Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:02pm

Do not remove this disclaimer under penalty of law.
 
FYI: NFHS 4-7-c: There must be reasonable space between two defensive players or a defensive player and a boundary line to allow the dribbler to continue in his/her path. If there is less than 3 feet of space, the dribbler has the greater responsibility for the contact.

BillyMac Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:03pm

Return to sender.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 581841)
Not sure, apparently there isn't enough evidence.

Apparently a photo, several eye witnesses, and an apology from Phelps isn't enough evidence in some jurisdictions.

Adam Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 581843)
Apparently a photo, several eye witnesses, and an apology from Phelps isn't enough evidence in some jurisdictions.

My guess, there's not enough evidence of a serious crime. At best, he'd get a misdimeanor, I think (not sure about SC law). I'm guessing the DA slapped the sheriff upside the head and told him not to pursue this; thus saving SC tax payers quite a bit of money.

mbyron Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 581849)
My guess, there's not enough evidence of a serious crime. At best, he'd get a misdimeanor, I think (not sure about SC law). I'm guessing the DA slapped the sheriff upside the head and told him not to pursue this; thus saving SC tax payers quite a bit of money.

Good guess. Since the photo showed him with his mouth on the bong, I kept waiting to hear "he didn't inhale." ;)

fullor30 Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 582018)
Good guess. Since the photo showed him with his mouth on the bong, I kept waiting to hear "he didn't inhale." ;)

Or if Bill mixed up his excuses........

I did not have sex with that bong.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1