Two for one?

[Juulie Downs]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Okay, I just thought of something and wondered how it should be enforced.

B has already received a Delay of Game warning.
A has a throwin, and B2 reaches across the plane and fouls A1.
Intentional or technical? Surely you can't call both on this. But surely the penalty shouldn't be more severe with no contact than it is with contact. Right?

Wouldn't the second DOG trump the intentional ? It's just a T, because of the DOG. Contact or no contact, the player committed a DOG when he reached across. The T is for the stupidity!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Juulie Downs

Wouldn't the second DOG trump the intentional ? It's just a T, because of the DOG. Contact or no contact, the player committed a DOG when he reached across. The T is for the stupidity!

This is where I lean.