The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Questionable T? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/50622-questionable-t.html)

ref2coach Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 563571)
For people like yourself who seem to take a different approach, I always wonder what makes the list and what doesn't?

T or not? (? to anyone, not just BZ)
1. d@mn
2. Jesus Christ
3. son of gun
4. dang
5. suck
6. crap
7. OMG

In TN in the State rules meetings for Coaches & Referees, #5 was announced as unsporting language to be punished. So at least for that one I will follow the State's instruction.

Jburt Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 563571)

T or not? (? to anyone, not just BZ)
1. d@mn
2. Jesus Christ
3. son of gun
4. dang
5. suck
6. crap
7. OMG

Depending on the context, I would say all could be T'able offenses. Same as "Are you kidding me?"

ma_ref Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jburt (Post 563640)
Depending on the context, I would say all could be T'able offenses. Same as "Are you kidding me?"

Exactly. I could say yes or no to each of those words/phrases, depending on the situation...

eyezen Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 563571)

T or not? (? to anyone, not just BZ)
1. d@mn
2. Jesus Christ
3. son of gun
4. dang
5. suck
6. crap
7. OMG

What about "ALLAH!!!" or JOBU!!!" or my personal favorite for those practicing pastafarianism "Flying Spaghetti Monster!!!" ?

grunewar Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:31pm

Or, you could be like Kobe, who reportedly learned to swear in many different languages so as not to "offend the refs" or anyone else present in ear-shot.......unless of course they happen to speak/understand the language he was swearing in. :eek:

Adam Fri Jan 02, 2009 01:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 563571)
T or not? (? to anyone, not just BZ)
1. d@mn
2. Jesus Christ
3. son of gun
4. dang
5. suck
6. crap
7. OMG

I've T'd 1,2,5,6,7. I've also ignored all of them at given times.

Further, I've T'd "sh!t," and ignored "Bull sh1t" once.

Of course, the BS reference was a coach standing next to me asking, "Isn't it a T if he says Bull sh!t like that?" I knew the hot head player he was talking about, but I hadn't heard the expletive.

Nevadaref Fri Jan 02, 2009 02:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jburt (Post 563640)
Depending on the context, I would say all could be T'able offenses. Same as "Are you kidding me?"

Quote:

Originally Posted by ma_ref (Post 563644)
Exactly. I could say yes or no to each of those words/phrases, depending on the situation...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 563664)
I've T'd 1,2,5,6,7. I've also ignored all of them at given times.

So all of you consider the CONTEXT of the speech, not just the word itself. That is the position that I have advocated. However, the position of BZ is very different. He says that the context doesn't matter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad Zebra (Post 563550)
If you heard the word "a$$" come out of her mouth...WHACK! T will be servedŽ. It's profanity and the rule couldn't be clearer. It doesn't matter what the context was or what garbled words followed. Seems pretty cut and dried to me.

He seems to operate by a list of "magic words" that constitute profanity and will earn an automatic T.
Therefore, my post was aimed at getting people's opinions of which words were always T'able. I'm not after an answer of "depends on the context."

Quote:

Originally Posted by ref2coach (Post 563631)
In TN in the State rules meetings for Coaches & Referees, #5 was announced as unsporting language to be punished. So at least for that one I will follow the State's instruction.

Thank you. That is the kind of information that I was seeking.
Anyone else got something such as that?

Chess Ref Fri Jan 02, 2009 02:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 563705)
Anyone else got something such as that?

JUCO refs in Northern California have been told that swearing is NOT a T worthy offense.

I don't do JUCO but several officiating buddies do and they have told me about the email.....

ma_ref Fri Jan 02, 2009 02:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chess Ref (Post 563707)
JUCO refs in Northern California have been told that swearing is NOT a T worthy offense.

I don't do JUCO but several officiating buddies do and they have told me about the email.....

I work JUCO games, and sometimes *I* feel like swearing...

M&M Guy Fri Jan 02, 2009 02:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ref2coach (Post 563631)
In TN in the State rules meetings for Coaches & Referees, #5 was announced as unsporting language to be punished. So at least for that one I will follow the State's instruction.

So, during warmups, you overhear one player talking to his teammate about his science project, "Yea, I used my mom's vaccum cleaner to <B>suck</B> the air out of the chamber."

Would you start the game with a T? Would the state back you on this? Or, is context still important?

Adam Fri Jan 02, 2009 02:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 563705)
So all of you consider the CONTEXT of the speech, not just the word itself. That is the position that I have advocated. However, the position of BZ is very different. He says that the context doesn't matter.

He seems to operate by a list of "magic words" that constitute profanity and will earn an automatic T.
Therefore, my post was aimed at getting people's opinions of which words were always T'able. I'm not after an answer of "depends on the context."

Thank you. That is the kind of information that I was seeking.
Anyone else got something such as that?

I'm unable to think of a word that's always T-able without regard to context. There is a catch-all context that I will never T for, regardless of the word.

"Ref, #24 just called me a stupid D@n_r3f."

M&M Guy Fri Jan 02, 2009 02:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ma_ref (Post 563708)
I work JUCO games, and sometimes *I* feel like swearing...

:D

My vote for post of the week.

M&M Guy Fri Jan 02, 2009 03:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 563712)
I'm unable to think of a word that's always T-able without regard to context. There is a catch-all context that I will never T for, regardless of the word.

"Ref, #24 just called me a stupid *$^&%#$."

How about: "Ref, #24 said you are a stupid *$^&%#$."

(Actually, your correction is funnier.)

JRutledge Fri Jan 02, 2009 03:04pm

This is why saying that certain words or certain comments are and "automatic" foul only get you in trouble. What if a player says those things after blowing out their knee? Are you we going to be Mr. Tough Guy and T them up then?

I have probably heard all those words and not given a single T. The context was not about the officiating or the opponent in anyway. I have heard coaches use harsher or much more profane words and not given a T, because the comments were said to me one on one and were not about me personally. Like one time a coach said with a complete smile, "That kid could fu@kin play at all; can you find me someone else to take his spot?" No one heard the comments but me and the coach. Sorry, I am not giving a T for that.

Peace

Adam Fri Jan 02, 2009 03:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy (Post 563715)
How about: "Ref, #24 said you are a stupid D@n_r3f."

I took the liberty. :)

In that case, as long as it wasn't followed by, "and your partner agreed."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1