The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Rule change time (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/50358-rule-change-time.html)

Mark Padgett Mon Dec 15, 2008 03:38pm

Rule change time
 
We haven't done this for quite a while, so I thought I'd bring it up again. If you could change just one rule in either NF or NCAA, what would it be and why? I'll throw this one out to start. Eliminate 5 second closely guarded counts in any games that have a shot clock. It's redundant.

Ignats75 Mon Dec 15, 2008 03:44pm

Eliminate three seconds. That way the parents will be quiet. :D

Actually, eliminate the fashion police rules. Not my yob man.

dbking Mon Dec 15, 2008 03:54pm

Free throw
 
Allow non shooters on the lane to enter on release. Now that we have moved them back a spot, it is almost impossible to block out the shooter.

jdmara Mon Dec 15, 2008 04:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbking (Post 558431)
Allow non shooters on the lane to enter on release. Now that we have moved them back a spot, it is almost impossible to block out the shooter.

Really? I'm not questioning the possibility of the shooter getting the rebound, but I've not seen this once, since the rule change, where the shooter has "shot the hole" and made it to the basket before the inside players. Has you seen the shooter make it to the basket untouched?

-Josh

OHBBREF Mon Dec 15, 2008 04:27pm

Jump stop
 
Jump Stop,
It confuses the Traveling violation call and too many officials either do not understand it or just do not call it correctly.

Adam Mon Dec 15, 2008 04:33pm

Same one I always say:
No more timeout requests from the coach.

Oh, and my quixotic arrow issue: flip the arrow as soon as it's at the disposal of the thrower.

IREFU2 Mon Dec 15, 2008 04:35pm

Get rid of the 5 second closely guarded count, except on a held ball within 3 feet.

26 Year Gap Mon Dec 15, 2008 04:37pm

delay in return to the court after a throw-in penalized by a violation call instead of a technical

OHBBREF Mon Dec 15, 2008 04:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 558443)
Same one I always say:
No more timeout requests from the coach.

I like this one also.

jdmara Mon Dec 15, 2008 05:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by snaqwells (Post 558443)
same one i always say:
No more timeout requests from the coach.

2+

BillyMac Mon Dec 15, 2008 08:27pm

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 558443)
No more timeout requests from the coach.

Amen. In fact, it's worth two. Amen.

Also, just two minor changes in the jump ball rules. First, eliminate the jump ball that starts the game. Second, eliminate the jump ball that starts the extra periods. Flip a coin, like in soccer, and football.

Mark Padgett: How do they decide who hits first in your croquet games?

Juulie Downs Mon Dec 15, 2008 08:30pm

I agree about coaches calling TO.

But my big issue, after taking a year off and now coming back into it "fresh", is the whole "team control or not on a throw-in, and whether or not someone can catch a ball or not after it's been tipped by a teammate or opponent, while she's in the air or straddling the line, etc, etc, etc". Ugh. CLEAN THAT ONE UP!!

But mostly, I wish they'd just leave all the rules the same for a couple of years. Maybe next year?? This year it got down to the darn headband definition, for pete sake. How about let's leave it now? One year with NO RULE CHANGES!?!?

26 Year Gap Mon Dec 15, 2008 08:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juulie Downs (Post 558515)
I agree about coaches calling TO.

But my big issue, after taking a year off and now coming back into it "fresh", is the whole "team control or not on a throw-in, and whether or not someone can catch a ball or not after it's been tipped by a teammate or opponent, while she's in the air or straddling the line, etc, etc, etc". Ugh. CLEAN THAT ONE UP!!

But mostly, I wish they'd just leave all the rules the same for a couple of years. Maybe next year?? This year it got down to the darn headband definition, for pete sake. How about let's leave it now? One year with NO RULE CHANGES!?!?

Then we'd hear "We paid all you guys to get together and meet and you didn't DO anything?"

BillyMac Mon Dec 15, 2008 08:55pm

Back To The Future ???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Juulie Downs (Post 558515)
I wish they'd just leave all the rules the same for a couple of years. Maybe next year?? This year it got down to the darn headband definition, for pete sake. How about let's leave it now? One year with NO RULE CHANGES!?!?

Agree. I've always said, after twenty-eight years of doing this, that the rules are easy to understand, it's the rule changes that make it confusing.

So, you want the NFHS to make a rule that there will be no rule changes? But isn't that in itself a rule change? I still have great memories of that old change in status rule. Can you all hear Barbra Streisand singing in the background?

Juulie Downs: Who's pete? Is he a Forum member.

eyezen Mon Dec 15, 2008 09:13pm

No cell phones allowed within the hearable confines of the gym.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1