The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Who is writing this stuff? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/50089-who-writing-stuff.html)

cdaref Tue Dec 02, 2008 04:00am

You realize there is a question about 0 and 00 on this year's test, right? Is that what led you to post this?

BillyMac Tue Dec 02, 2008 07:41pm

Too Confusing For Me, I'll Just Let My Partner Handle It ...
 
Now you guys know why I left the 0, 00, issue out of my recent Administrative Technical Foul Penalty study guide. It was too confusing, are they treated as illegal, or identical, or both. I just left this part out.

http://forum.officiating.com/basketb...penalties.html

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Dec 02, 2008 09:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 554770)
Now you guys know why I left the 0, 00, issue out of my recent Administrative Technical Foul Penalty study guide. It was too confusing, are they treated as illegal, or identical, or both. I just left this part out.

http://forum.officiating.com/basketb...penalties.html


Billy:

Think of it this way:

1) Team A has a player listed in the book wearing the number "0"; that is legal.

2) Team A has a player listed in the book wearing the number "00"; that is legal.

3) Team A has a player listed in the book wearing the number "0" and another player listed in the book wearing hte number "00"; these considered identical numbers. The first player listed is legal and the second player listed must change his number. The penalty is one (1) technical foul charged to the team.

MTD, Sr.

Nevadaref Wed Dec 03, 2008 04:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdaref (Post 554555)
You realize there is a question about 0 and 00 on this year's test, right? Is that what led you to post this?

I must have overlooked that. Can you provide the question #?

Nevadaref Wed Dec 03, 2008 04:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 554801)
The first player listed is legal and the second player listed must change his number.

Couldn't the first player listed be illegal and the second one be legal? :eek:

Raymond Wed Dec 03, 2008 08:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 554519)
States: "Three minutes before the game starts, it is discovered: (b) two Team B team members are wearing the same number. RULING: In (b), a technical foul is charged to Team B upon discovery of the identical numbers. Only one team member may wear a given number; the other must change to a number not already in use before participating. (R10-S1-A2)"


I don't have my books on me but why is it a T for 2 members to wear the same number 3 minutes before the game starts...or before both players participate in the game for that matter? It doesn't necessarily mean that identical numbers are in the book for those players.

What is the wording of rule 10-1-2?

bob jenkins Wed Dec 03, 2008 09:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 554860)
What is the wording of rule 10-1-2?

10-1-2e: (After the 10 minute mark...) Have identical numbers on team members and/or players.

My take:

While having both 0 and 00 on the team member list is a violation of 3-4-3d, there's no penalty listed in that section.

0 and 00 are not identical. The second becomes illegal only when that player enters the game -- and it's then charged to the coach. (10-5-4)

Suppose the roster had a number 66 on it (or one team member put a "memorial patch" with a number on it on his/her uniform). Would we penalize immediately? No -- only when (if) that player entered. Same with 0 an 00.

JRutledge Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 554867)
10-1-2e: (After the 10 minute mark...) Have identical numbers on team members and/or players.

My take:

While having both 0 and 00 on the team member list is a violation of 3-4-3d, there's no penalty listed in that section.

0 and 00 are not identical. The second becomes illegal only when that player enters the game -- and it's then charged to the coach. (10-5-4)

Suppose the roster had a number 66 on it (or one team member put a "memorial patch" with a number on it on his/her uniform). Would we penalize immediately? No -- only when (if) that player entered. Same with 0 an 00.

Yep.

Peace

CoachP Wed Dec 03, 2008 02:08pm

10-15 players, 35 numbers to pick from.....just remove 0 and 00 from the list of legal numbers? How many 0 or 00's do you guys really see out there?

In 14 years, I've seen 0 once.

Not counting the one JV girl game where she was a 10 the first half and came out as a 0 for the second. (The iron-on 1 fell off). The official had us do the white athletic tape trick to make a 1.

JRutledge Wed Dec 03, 2008 02:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoachP (Post 555046)
10-15 players, 35 numbers to pick from.....just remove 0 and 00 from the list of legal numbers? How many 0 or 00's do you guys really see out there?

In 14 years, I've seen 0 once.

Not counting the one JV girl game where she was a 10 the first half and came out as a 0 for the second. (The iron-on 1 fell off). The official had us do the white athletic tape trick to make a 1.

I have seen the number multiple times over the years. You do not see them every game, but you see them or even every season, but you will see them from time to time. And how many times we see the number is really not relevant if you ask me. This is allowed and we deal with it.

Peace

Nevadaref Wed Dec 03, 2008 07:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 554867)
Suppose the roster had a number 66 on it ...
Would we penalize immediately?

Is there a specific rule prohibiting the team member list from containing the number 66?

just another ref Wed Dec 03, 2008 07:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 555175)
Is there a specific rule prohibiting the team member list from containing the number 66?

yes

Nevadaref Wed Dec 03, 2008 08:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 555178)
yes

Really? Please provide the citation.

just another ref Wed Dec 03, 2008 08:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 555178)
yes

My bad. I thought you were asking a rhetorical question. The point is that 0 and 00, while both legal numbers, are specifically forbidden from being on the same list. Other illegal number are not specifically forbidden from the list.
Is that the point? IOW, is it ok for a player to wear 66 every night, so long as he doesn't play?

AKOFL Wed Dec 03, 2008 09:00pm

Nice number, No playing time!!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1