The Official Forum
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Situation starting season-Dunk in warmups (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/49688-situation-starting-season-dunk-warmups.html)

Adam Mon Nov 03, 2008 02:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 548270)
What if in the pre-game dunk, a player used his teammate's back to get the needed elevation.

Is that 3 T's?
Sure. Then, before the official has a chance to report the Ts, he turns and starts taunting the other team during warmups. 4, 5, and 6.

Seriously, this would be a situation where I'd give the coach a lot of leeway when yelling at the players. He's already done anyway. :)

Indianaref Mon Nov 03, 2008 03:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 548270)
What if in the pre-game dunk, a player used his teammate's back to get the needed elevation.

Is that 3 T's?
And he was chewing tobacco.

Adam Mon Nov 03, 2008 03:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianaref (Post 548282)
And he was chewing tobacco.
Nice, now you get a flagrant one as well. Not that it matters at this point, kid's already having a career night.

And if Padgett was officiating that game, he might just retire he'd be so happy; after his cigarette, of course.

tjones1 Mon Nov 03, 2008 03:49pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 548253)
Don't have my NFHS books with me at the moment. Wasn't there an Interp or Case Play in which a player dunks the ball and hangs on the rim following the horn to end a quarter and the resolution was to assess 2 T's?
No, only one technical foul is issued for dunking a dead ball.

10.3.3 Situation E

LDUB Mon Nov 03, 2008 05:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 548267)
There isn't any rules basis for it. Sorry I wasn't clear, but I'd be in favor of amending the rule to put a cap on pre-game indirect technicals. Although the frequency of this situation is such that it wouldn't really have any effect at all. But since we're already getting theoretorical.
What is the point of doing that? So he gets 2 indirects before the game, all the third player has to do is stand up off the bench as soon as the game starts. You're just delaying the ejection. If they want him gone you won't be able to stop them.

Adam Mon Nov 03, 2008 07:00pm
LDUB, that's a good point. Might give him a chance to address it before the game, though. Then again, the players could all simply jump off the bench as soon as the ball becomes live.

I'm no longer in favor of that change; it wouldn't have any impact.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12pm.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1