2008-2009 Interps

[bob jenkins]

FED has issued the interps for this year: http://www.nfhs.org/web/2008/10/2008..._rules_in.aspx

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

I just read Situation 5, and boy let me tell you, boys' games are going to be more difficult to officiate than ever this year.

MTD, Sr.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I just read Situation 5, and boy let me tell you, boys' games are going to be more difficult to officiate than ever this year.

MTD, Sr.

Lots of dreds and cornrows around here, so this situation is not out the realm of possibilities.

[Scrapper1]

None of these is really all that interesting this year.

[Coach Bill]

SITUATION 7: While the ball is at the disposal of A1 for a free throw, B1, along the lane line, steps out of the lane space. The official displays the appropriate delay signal. Five seconds later, A2, along the lane line, steps into the lane followed by A1 releasing the free throw. The ball enters the basket. RULING: A2's violation followed B1's; therefore, the second violation is ignored and the try is successful. COMMENT: The penalty only addresses one violation being followed by the other. There is no timeframe associated with "followed by" in the rule; therefore, the second violation is ignored. (9-1-3d Penalty 4a)


Does this only apply to this particular instance? What if A2 did not enter the lane prior to the free throw, but A1 shot an airball? I think it's been said on here that you don't ignore the second violation in this case, and you go to the possession arrow (if it's one-and-one).

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Coach Bill

SITUATION 7: ...

Does this only apply to this particular instance? What if A2 did not enter the lane prior to the free throw, but A1 shot an airball? I think it's been said on here that you don't ignore the second violation in this case, and you go to the possession arrow (if it's one-and-one).

Does not apply. First-one-only applies only to violations by players along the lane, not the shooter and not the players not on the lane.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Coach Bill

Does this only apply to this particular instance? What if A2 did not enter the lane prior to the free throw, but A1 shot an airball? I think it's been said on here that you don't ignore the second violation in this case, and you go to the possession arrow (if it's one-and-one).

I had this exact scenario (for the first time ever) just last weekend. And we went to the arrow.

Unfortunately the penalties section for free throws is kind of long. But here's the section relevant to the case:

...
4. If there is a violation first by the free-thrower's opponent followed by the free thrower or a teammate:
a. If both offenders are in a marked lane-space, the second violation is ignored, as in penalty item (2).
b. If the second violation is by the free thrower or a teammate behind the free-throw line extended and the three-point line, both violations are penalized, as in penalty item (3).
c. If a violation by the free thrower follows disconcertion by an opponent, a substitute free throw shall be awarded.
d. If a fake by an opponent causes the free thrower or a teammate of the free thrower to violate, only the fake is penalized.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Lots of dreds and cornrows around here, so this situation is not out the realm of possibilities.

This is a common thing around here too.

Peace

[ccso989]

does anyone know where to get the anwsers for 08-09 part 1

[JRutledge]

Yes.

Peace

[ccso989]

where at, any help would be great thanks.

[Indianaref]

Originally Posted by ccso989

where at, any help would be great thanks.

The Rule Book. Rule 1-10.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ccso989

where at, any help would be great thanks.

The 2008-09 Case and Rule Books should have all the answers.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

The 2008-09 Case and Rule Books should have all the answers.

And if there are questions you still can't find answers to after diligently searching those sources, come back and ask. We don't mind helping with individual questions; we do mind people asking for a copy of the answers. There are some hereabouts that would even throw out the "c word" in regards to such requests. I'm just sayin'

[just another ref]

Try the rule book and the case book.