What do you have???

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

The other call being a charge, I can agree. The other call being a no-call because the defender flopped out of what would have been a charge, I can agree. The other call being a no-call because it was so close and hard to tell...that i can't agree on.

We're in 99% agreement, then.

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And that is my main issue..some of the "no-calls" seem to be based on the closeness of the play....and that is not acceptable.

To me, it's close between a no-call (due to the flop) and a block. One call is right, the other is wrong; but both are understandable.

I haven't seen anyone say it's too close to call so just let it go. Maybe I missed it.