The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 09:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
Cornellref, I assumed he just receive a pass b/c this wouldn't be much of a question if he had already dribbled. You are correct, there was some important info left out.
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 131
Well analyze it both ways.

In this situation however assume he is holding the ball and still has his dribble. He then bends over and places the ball on the floor and walks away.

I think there is surely a violation if a player has his dribble and then places it on the floor, walks away, and then comes back retrieves it and dribbles again.

Assume here is still has his dribble and is holding the ball in the front court by the midcourt line area, for the "last shot."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 10:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
I would say that this is a double dribble... Clarify this for me but wouldn't this be similar to the situation where Offender A (who is in possesion of the ball) rips through the defender to clear himself and while in the process bangs the ball on the floor. After this sequence of events the defender steps back and the offender proceeds to drive to the basket. Tweet... Double Dribble!!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 10:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8
Similar play happened to me this year except the player set the ball on the floor, wiped his hands off on his shorts, then picked the ball up and passed it. In my situation, no violation. NBA Referee Don Vaden was at my game when it happened and we discussed the scenario after the game. Had the player in my game dribbled, I would have called a double dribble.

In the situation in the original post, there is a violation... illegal dribble.


Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 10:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
Should we distinguish a difference between, a) A1 has both hands on the underside of the ball and lowers his hands to the floor until the ball is resting on the floor and then removing his hands, thus not pushing the ball to the floor. b) both hands on the upper side of the ball and lowering the ball to the floor and then releasing the ball, thus calling this pushing the ball to the floor for the start of a dribble?
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 11:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 131
Bart,
Thats the whole point. Some clarification is needed to determine whether this player ever started a dribble and, if he did, whether his dribble ended.

Things that make you say hmmm.....
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 11:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by iref21
I would say that this is a double dribble... Clarify this for me but wouldn't this be similar to the situation where Offender A (who is in possesion of the ball) rips through the defender to clear himself and while in the process bangs the ball on the floor. After this sequence of events the defender steps back and the offender proceeds to drive to the basket. Tweet... Double Dribble!!
Bangs the ball to the floor?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 11:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
Yes i agree that is the point, the start of the dribble. There is nothing in the rule about not being allow to rest the ball on the floor. I guess if the official determines he pushed to ball vs letting the ball gravitate to the floor then you could have a start of a dribble. Which brings the play of a player diving to the floor grabbing the ball for control, then resting the ball on the floor, then getting up, then grabbing the ball again. What do you call?
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 11:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
1- The original post said nothing about dribbling the ball prior to sitting it on the floor. It said he was holding the ball.

2- Sitting the ball on the floor is not a dribble. If it was, it would be legal to gain position while having a knee touching the floor, sit the ball on the floor, rise to one's feet and retireve the ball. We know that's illegal but it is legal to begin a dribble from the same position. That tells us that sitting the ball on the floor is not the beginning of a dribble.

Therefore, this is not an illegal or double dribble. As has been said, there's no PC, so there's no travel.

No violation.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 11:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
Which brings the play of a player diving to the floor grabbing the ball for control, then resting the ball on the floor, then getting up, then grabbing the ball again. What do you call?
Travelling. FED 4.43.5B

And, I think that provides the answer to the original question.

The only way the case is travelling is if "placing the ball on the floor" (in some sort of controlled manner) is equivalent to "holding the ball."

Thus, I'd have a traveling violation in the original case for lifting the pivot foot before the ball was released on a pass or try. (The violation occurs when A touches the ball again.)
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 12:08pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
Which brings the play of a player diving to the floor grabbing the ball for control, then resting the ball on the floor, then getting up, then grabbing the ball again. What do you call?
Travelling. FED 4.43.5B

And, I think that provides the answer to the original question.

The only way the case is travelling is if "placing the ball on the floor" (in some sort of controlled manner) is equivalent to "holding the ball."

Thus, I'd have a traveling violation in the original case for lifting the pivot foot before the ball was released on a pass or try. (The violation occurs when A touches the ball again.)
That's pretty clever, Bob!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 03:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
So this play has less to do with difinitions and more to do with the case play of 4.43.5b. Hmmm Is this how you see it?
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 03:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
I see the point of bringing up the case play, but I've always thought of that as being a sort of "exception" that was put in to prevent a player from intentionally circumventing a rule. It seems like they didn't want to change the definition of travelling, but they realized that, as written, the rule allowed a player to weasel out of this situation. So they put in that one sentence.

I personally don't like applying it to the play in the original post. I could be wrong, obviously, but I still have nothing on the original play.

Additionally, what does case 4.43.5B have to do with lifting the pivot before releasing on a pass or try? I'm not sure I see the connection Bob seems to be making.

And since when is it a violation to lift the pivot before releasing the ball on a pass or try? Obviously, I've missed Bob's real point somehow. Are you equating the original play with the following?

"A1 jumps to attempt a try, but seeing that it will be blocked, drops the ball to the floor, where A1 is the first to recover the ball."

If so, then at least I see the connection you're trying to make, although I haven't had time to think it all the way through.

Chuck

[Edited by ChuckElias on Apr 19th, 2002 at 03:37 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 05:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
I have a T on Team B's head coach. He's cursing profanely at his players for not going after the ball!

Other than that, I agree with Chuck. I have nothing.

I'm just curious,is it possible to curse at someone without doing it profanely. If so then I hope coaches never find out about it. I think you meant to say "cursing at his players profusely".

As to the original sitch, I have nothing based on what play was described. I do recall in the casebook, where you cannot place the ball on the floor to get up and then pick it up once you are standing. This is considered a pass to one's self. And simply touching the ball to the floor is not considered a dribble. Again, if you can't explain it, don't call it.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 19, 2002, 07:22pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb Yes, I believe it is possible.

Quote:
Originally posted by Schmidt MJ


I'm just curious,is it possible to curse at someone without doing it profanely.
Apologizing for being off-subject, but I feel the need to answer this question.


From a book of curses, I forget the name of the book:

"May all of the teeth in your head fall out, except one, so that you may have a toothache."



mick


Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1