The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Partner with different philosophy (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/40629-partner-different-philosophy.html)

ABO77 Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:38pm

Partner with different philosophy
 
Im a new Jv official so I dont get to have long elaborate pre-games before the game, so...if you have a partner that has a different way of calling the game as you, how do you guys/gals adjust (or not) your style of officiating?

Ex, I tend to call the game a little tight early in the game and let the players adjust accordingly BUT some officials let them play a little early in the game and THEN adjust their calls to the style of play. Im not aurguing which way is better however Im wondering how you handle this sit and others similar to it.

Do you change the way you call the game according to how your partner calls it? If so to what degree? Or do you stick to your philosophy the whole game irregardless (:D ) of what your partner calls...which might lead to conflicting calls ?

JRutledge Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ABO77
Im a new Jv official so I dont get to have long elaborate pre-games before the game, so...if you have a partner that has a different way of calling the game as you, how do you guys/gals adjust (or not) your style of officiating?

Ex, I tend to call the game a little tight early in the game and let the players adjust accordingly BUT some officials let them play a little early in the game and THEN adjust their calls to the style of play. Im not aurguing which way is better however Im wondering how you handle this sit and others similar to it.

Do you change the way you call the game according to how your partner calls it? If so to what degree? Or do you stick to your philosophy the whole game irregardless (:D ) of what your partner calls...which might lead to conflicting calls ?

The only major way I adjust is if my partner is calling a particular thing, I might go looking to see if I can get a similar foul. But if it is not there I am not going to make it up or assume I am missing anything.

I also do not like the terminology "calling it tight" or "calling it loose." I call the game from and advantage/disadvantage and not every game has the same level of advantage or disadvantage in those games. This just comes with time and learning how to officiate with others. There is not a magic formula.

Peace

lpbreeze Thu Dec 27, 2007 02:02am

I learned to call it my way although the ref can have somewhat of an influence on that. If my partner wants few fouls or a tight game then I might go a bit toward that but overall do your own way and things should work out. work together but don't let one dictate how the game is going to be called.

Nevadaref Thu Dec 27, 2007 03:58am

When one tries to officiate in a manner other than what is normal for that individual, one frequently fails.

Rich Thu Dec 27, 2007 07:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by lpbreeze
I learned to call it my way although the ref can have somewhat of an influence on that. If my partner wants few fouls or a tight game then I might go a bit toward that but overall do your own way and things should work out. work together but don't let one dictate how the game is going to be called.

Why does "the ref" have any influence? Does his toss of the ball influence your next 32 minutes?

kbilla Thu Dec 27, 2007 08:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ABO77
Im a new Jv official so I dont get to have long elaborate pre-games before the game, so...if you have a partner that has a different way of calling the game as you, how do you guys/gals adjust (or not) your style of officiating?

Ex, I tend to call the game a little tight early in the game and let the players adjust accordingly BUT some officials let them play a little early in the game and THEN adjust their calls to the style of play. Im not aurguing which way is better however Im wondering how you handle this sit and others similar to it.

Do you change the way you call the game according to how your partner calls it? If so to what degree? Or do you stick to your philosophy the whole game irregardless (:D ) of what your partner calls...which might lead to conflicting calls ?

IMO there are a few items that are reasonable to "adjust" based on how your partners are calling the game - and I say partners b/c to me it doesn't matter who has what "philosophy" be it the R or whoever, you are all out there calling the game once it goes up and neither coach could care less what calls the R makes vs. the other two officials...one item that should be consistent is the illegal screen. If my partner gets one at one end I am going to be on high alert for one on the other end - again not fishing per se, but if there is one there I am going to get it. The other item is carrying the basketball. Same thing, if A's point guard does it and my partner gets it, I am going to be watching B's point guard also...and God forbid we get a 3-second on one end, you better be watching the other end as well...other than that, there isn't a whole lot you can do IMO. First of all if your partner has a common foul in their PCA, you aren't going to necessarily know how "tight" they are calling it b/c most likely you are off ball - how are you going to know what to adjust? Like I said JMO, but other than those few items, I just call my own game, worrying about adjusting too much can get you into trouble..

Vinski Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:31am

In my brief carrier, one thing that I have noticed that varies frequently among different calling styles is traveling. Especially in lower level games where you see more of it. However, some refs call it tight regardless of the level. Try to grab at least a few seconds and discuss this with your partner if you can. When you have one ref calling travel on every little drag or slight stammer and the other official is letting some of those things go, the lopsided calling is obvious. However, as Nevada stated, if you try to change your officiating style to match someone else’s, you will not be happy with your self afterwards.

JoeTheRef Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinski
In my brief carrier, one thing that I have noticed that varies frequently among different calling styles is traveling. Especially in lower level games where you see more of it. However, some refs call it tight regardless of the level. Try to grab at least a few seconds and discuss this with your partner if you can. When you have one ref calling travel on every little drag or slight stammer and the other official is letting some of those things go, the lopsided calling is obvious. However, as Nevada stated, if you try to change your officiating style to match someone else’s, you will not be happy with your self afterwards.

I have a different theory on traveling. If you call it consistently in the lower levels, then they learn and it won't be a problem in the higher levels. Currently in the higher levels, college and high school, I tend to call the obvious traveling calls. If I can't get it the first time, because it may be borderline, to quick or ugly, then it is probably either not traveling or getting kicked. Regardless of what same may think on here, assignors have a problem with officials who want to over officiate and constantly interrupt the game with borderline, non-advantageous calls like a slight/possible travel, or slightly stepping over the endline on a throw-in after a basket.

And I guess since I may be your first response, I think you meant to say "career" vs. carrier.:D

Junker Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:07am

This is a good subject for pregame. Obviously you don't tell someone how to call a game, but you can discuss patient whistles, not bailing out shooters, handchecks, illegal screens and stuch. I agree that after that you should call your game. When you change what you do you get yourself in trouble. I tried to do some adjustment in a JUCO game this season and I wish I wouldn't have. I made a call to help with "consistancy" that I normally woulnd't have and the coach knew me and knew I shouldn't have called it. It was a good learning experience. From here on out I call my game.

JoeTheRef Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:25am

When in Rome... I hear that often on here and I have to agree with it. Had a college game this year where I told the "R" during a timeout that I am having a philosophical dilemma. I've been trained all summer long not to make the calls he wanted me to make, and it kind of screwed my head up for the 1st half. After I told him that, I called the game that HE wanted, which I didn't have a problem doing because it was probably like I would call a high school game. Just to clarify, I've been told countless times this entire summer, this ain't high school, at this level the girls can play through some stuff.

Mark Padgett Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ABO77
so...if you have a partner that has a different way of calling the game as you

You mean in a foreign language or something like that? Sometimes I call the game in pig-latin. It sounds like this:

"Iyay avehay ayay echnicaltay onyay ethay ueblay oachcay. At'sthay ishay econdsay irectday echnicaltay ofyay ethay amegay andyay ehay isyay isqualifiedday. Ifyay ehay oesn'tday etgay outyay ofyay erehay ightray ownay, I'llyay akemay imhay ishway ehay adhay evernay eenbay ornbay."

Rich Thu Dec 27, 2007 01:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeTheRef
When in Rome... I hear that often on here and I have to agree with it. Had a college game this year where I told the "R" during a timeout that I am having a philosophical dilemma. I've been trained all summer long not to make the calls he wanted me to make, and it kind of screwed my head up for the 1st half. After I told him that, I called the game that HE wanted, which I didn't have a problem doing because it was probably like I would call a high school game. Just to clarify, I've been told countless times this entire summer, this ain't high school, at this level the girls can play through some stuff.

Since when does the referee dictate how you officiate?

JS 20 Thu Dec 27, 2007 01:38pm

This is my 7th year as a referee but my first year of HS (F and JV) ball. I've done a ton of middle school, men's rec and intramurals since I was 18. Being my first year, that's the biggest thing I've had to adjust to is working w/ veteran guys who want to control the game a certain way and I really don't agree with it. One guy told me he wouldn't call any fouls in the first minute of the game unless it was blatant and had to be called. This wasn't so bad. Other guys have had the "well if fouls are 7-1, i'm going to find one) theories which I totally object to.

I'm interested to see what my philosophies are in 10 years. Honestly, as a first year guy, I don't care what my partner calls or how he calls. I'm going to call what I see, when I see it. Sure, I let some contact go, I know the difference b/w a ticky tack foul and an obvious foul. But still I don't think it's fair to "find one" b/c fouls are lopsided, or to not call a travel that's not obvious but still a travel just b/c you called one two posessions ago. Keep the players from breaking the rules and let them decide the game.

JS 20 Thu Dec 27, 2007 01:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by kbilla
IMO there are a few items that are reasonable to "adjust" based on how your partners are calling the game - and I say partners b/c to me it doesn't matter who has what "philosophy" be it the R or whoever, you are all out there calling the game once it goes up and neither coach could care less what calls the R makes vs. the other two officials...one item that should be consistent is the illegal screen. If my partner gets one at one end I am going to be on high alert for one on the other end - again not fishing per se, but if there is one there I am going to get it. The other item is carrying the basketball. Same thing, if A's point guard does it and my partner gets it, I am going to be watching B's point guard also...and God forbid we get a 3-second on one end, you better be watching the other end as well...other than that, there isn't a whole lot you can do IMO. First of all if your partner has a common foul in their PCA, you aren't going to necessarily know how "tight" they are calling it b/c most likely you are off ball - how are you going to know what to adjust? Like I said JMO, but other than those few items, I just call my own game, worrying about adjusting too much can get you into trouble..

I really disagree with this. You don't (and shouldn't) have any idea why your partner called the 3 seconds. He could have told the player the last 3 times down the floor to get out of the lane and then finally got him b/c he wouldn't listen. That players inability to adjust shouldn't dictate you being any more willing to call 3 seconds on the other team than you normally would be.

JoeTheRef Thu Dec 27, 2007 02:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JS 20
This is my 7th year as a referee but my first year of HS (F and JV) ball. I've done a ton of middle school, men's rec and intramurals since I was 18. Being my first year, that's the biggest thing I've had to adjust to is working w/ veteran guys who want to control the game a certain way and I really don't agree with it. One guy told me he wouldn't call any fouls in the first minute of the game unless it was blatant and had to be called. This wasn't so bad. Other guys have had the "well if fouls are 7-1, i'm going to find one) theories which I totally object to.

I'm interested to see what my philosophies are in 10 years. Honestly, as a first year guy, I don't care what my partner calls or how he calls. I'm going to call what I see, when I see it. Sure, I let some contact go, I know the difference b/w a ticky tack foul and an obvious foul. But still I don't think it's fair to "find one" b/c fouls are lopsided, or to not call a travel that's not obvious but still a travel just b/c you called one two posessions ago. Keep the players from breaking the rules and let them decide the game.

Did you ever wonder why it took you 7 years of middle school and wreck ball just to get a taste of high school ball, Fresh & JV at that?? I'm not saying what you're saying is right or wrong, to each his own. I was just curious if you ever wondered or questioned where you are in your career path and why you are where you are. I am in my 7th year of officiating and currently working my first year of College (NCAA-W DII) and our philosophies differ in many ways. If you ever decide to question yourself, start with your statement highlighted above. JMO

Edited: JS, I can't say what I said without elaborating. You should care what your partners are calling and how they are calling the game. First thing I say in my pregame, and I don't care if I have a more veteran ref or newbie ref on my crew, is that we are going to call this game on the same sheet of music. Or in other words, we are going to be consistent tonight as a crew. Whether that is going to be consistently good or consistently bad, we are going to be consistent. Now if I have you calling stuff all over the court that you see and you judge as a "foul" and it's not consistent with the crew or the flow of the game, I'm calling you out at the first timeout we get. You my friend can cause havoc in a game with the mentality of the highlighted portion of your post. Again my .02.

FrankHtown Thu Dec 27, 2007 02:43pm

Joe, that was a very supercilious response. There are a number of factors that contribute to where a person is on their career path, not all of them having to do with knowing the rules or how to call a game.

I, for example, am in my 50's. I have no aspiration to graduate to JUCO, Division II or Division I or the NBA. But I go to camps every year to be the best High School ref I can be. I have no desire to start travelling 3 hours by car to get to some JUCO game that starts at 7:30 pm, and get home at 1am, then get back up at 5:30 to go to work.

FrankHtown Thu Dec 27, 2007 02:45pm

Joe,
Thank you for the edit....You expressed yourself very well.

JS 20 Thu Dec 27, 2007 03:02pm

Joe, I respect your perspective and your opinion. I simply disagree. I think we're both being a bit vague and probably would agree if we actually had a conversation about it not shortened by typing on the computer. I don't call all over the court or anything like that. I understand consistency. If there's 3 minutes left and the game is tied, I'll go to my partner during a timeout and we'll talk about things like "hey we haven't called 3 seconds all night, haven't done thsi or that, etc" and make sure we stay consistent. But if in that 3 minutes i keep telling a kid to get out of the lane and he doesn't, i'm going to get him.

Regarding your highlight of my response, I need to elaborate. At this point, I'm concerned w/ calling the game accurately while maintaining good mechanics. The game hasn't slowed down enough yet for me to have the same thoughts and theories as my veteran partners IMO.

In reply to wondering how it took me so long to get a taste of HS ball, I started at 18, I was in college for 4 years and I've traveled quite a bit for work until this year. I didn't have the time to dedicate to it. Don't assume I'm terrible b/c of my experience level or anything like that. Good for you on working college games in your 7th year. I hope I can move up in the ranks just as fast as you did.

Rich Thu Dec 27, 2007 03:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeTheRef
Did you ever wonder why it took you 7 years of middle school and wreck ball just to get a taste of high school ball, Fresh & JV at that?? I'm not saying what you're saying is right or wrong, to each his own. I was just curious if you ever wondered or questioned where you are in your career path and why you are where you are. I am in my 7th year of officiating and currently working my first year of College (NCAA-W DII) and our philosophies differ in many ways. If you ever decide to question yourself, start with your statement highlighted above. JMO

Edited: JS, I can't say what I said without elaborating. You should care what your partners are calling and how they are calling the game. First thing I say in my pregame, and I don't care if I have a more veteran ref or newbie ref on my crew, is that we are going to call this game on the same sheet of music. Or in other words, we are going to be consistent tonight as a crew. Whether that is going to be consistently good or consistently bad, we are going to be consistent. Now if I have you calling stuff all over the court that you see and you judge as a "foul" and it's not consistent with the crew or the flow of the game, I'm calling you out at the first timeout we get. You my friend can cause havoc in a game with the mentality of the highlighted portion of your post. Again my .02.

So you dictate how the other officials call games?

I find it just isn't that way once you've been doing this a while. Your philosophies aren't going to be THAT different and all officials, if they care, are going to try to meet in the middle.

It's this "I'm the ref and you're going to call it my way" crap I saw earlier in this thread that I think is nonsense. I'm not saying that's what you said above, so if we're on the same page, let me know. Good R's will slide to their partners as much as the partners adjust to them.

JoeTheRef Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichMSN
1. So you dictate how the other officials call games?

2. I find it just isn't that way once you've been doing this a while. Your philosophies aren't going to be THAT different and all officials, if they care, are going to try to meet in the middle.

3. It's this "I'm the ref and you're going to call it my way" crap I saw earlier in this thread that I think is nonsense. I'm not saying that's what you said above, so if we're on the same page, let me know. Good R's will slide to their partners as much as the partners adjust to them.


1. No I do not or try not to dictate how officials call games. I've been on that end of the stick where that "Veteran" puts so much stuff in your game it has your head spinning.
2. I totally agree and this is really the point I was trying to express.
3. This is not what I was saying (bold/underline). Good R's, U1s, U2s will slide to their partners as much as the partners adjust to them.

kbilla Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JS 20
I really disagree with this. You don't (and shouldn't) have any idea why your partner called the 3 seconds. He could have told the player the last 3 times down the floor to get out of the lane and then finally got him b/c he wouldn't listen. That players inability to adjust shouldn't dictate you being any more willing to call 3 seconds on the other team than you normally would be.

We'll just have to disagree on this one then...hey I'm not saying count by 2's, but if my partner gets a three second call on A, then instead of B getting a "get out get out get out", they might only get one "get out" before the call on that end..3-seconds is probably the most preventively officiated item during the game, there is certainly plenty of opportunity given both sides to avoid it...

Mark Padgett Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankHtown
Joe, that was a very supercilious response. There are a number of factors that contribute to where a person is on their career path, not all of them having to do with knowing the rules or how to call a game.

I, for example, am in my 50's. I have no aspiration to graduate to JUCO, Division II or Division I or the NBA. But I go to camps every year to be the best High School ref I can be. I have no desire to start travelling 3 hours by car to get to some JUCO game that starts at 7:30 pm, and get home at 1am, then get back up at 5:30 to go to work.

FrankHtown - you win today's Shakespeare award for using the word "supercilious" correctly in a post. Congratulations - we're not used to such "high class" words here. :)

Now, if you only hadn't misspelled "traveling". :rolleyes:

cdaref Fri Dec 28, 2007 03:07pm

I think Joe is right on, though he perhaps expressed himself poorly and came across as that ref that tells others how to call their game. :) I dont think that is what he is saying.

Back to the Original Poster:

Two things for you:

1. Your big problem is that you arent having a good pregame. Just because it is JV is no excuse to not have a good pregame. Get there an hour to 45 minutes ahead of time. Contact your partner a day or more ahead of time and make sure they will be there ahead of time too. If there is some reason they cant be (which there shouldnt be or they shouldnt have taken the game) then email each other or talk through things on the phone. You are cheating yourself and the players if you dont pregame as a crew. It is one of the most important things you can do. Do not tolerate partners that wont pregame or that skip pregames or that show up late. The pregame is the perfect time to "get on the same page" about fouls and philosophy.

2. Consistency is key. You'll find that the more experienced officials develop constiency and a flow to the games they work. Good officials seem to adjust a bit to their partners to make sure their whistles are the same as their partners. This isnt telling others how to call a game, it is making sure the crew is consistent. Becuase you arent out there to call your game, you are there as part of a crew that is repsonsible for calling the game. While you may only be able to control what you do, you need to work together as a crew.

It all starts in the pregame. Discuss with your partner how to handle press, and handchecks on the perimeter and talk through how each sees some common situations. Talk through contact in the post and displacement and rebounding position. You should have agreement. You guys should settle on that in your pregame. That is what it is for.

If you and your partner have the same whistle for things it really improves the flow of the game, it makes it easier for players to adjust and the whole feel of the crew is improved.

Being on the same page does not mean going out and looking for cheesy calls that arent there. Dont go find a lame keyhole call just to balance out your partner. BUT you should have pregamed how you handle kids in the key--we will talk to them, tell them to get out, if they dont listen, we whistle it. Just because that happened on your partner's end doesnt mean that you should make a call. But you should both be applying the same philosophy on both ends.

As you get more experienced you will get better at knowing what your partner is up to even though you are concentrating on your area and your responsibilites. Abnd you both will start to adjust ever so slightly to each other. That is, in my opinion, a hallmark of real good crews.

But bottom line is this--pregame this stuff and simply dont permit your partner to skip pregame. Particularly for a young official, pregames are crucial. Funny, but it always seems to be the awesome senior officials I work with who want to pregame and the lazy JV officials who dont. Gee, I wonder why each is where they are?

Good luck!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1