The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 25, 2007, 09:02pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
I misread initial post and thought he was calling foul on B1, not foul on A1. Concur with asessment and rule siting.

Gotta get my reading glasses out and read the fine print......of course, I would NEVER wear my glasses in a game!
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 25, 2007, 09:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 39
Thanks for the caseplays but I understand that this is a foul on A...I guess my new question is why have rule 4-23-2 dealing with ILGP?
__________________
All of my post are for NFHS rules
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 25, 2007, 09:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABO77
Thanks for the caseplays but I understand that this is a foul on A...I guess my new question is why have rule 4-23-2 dealing with ILGP?
Very simple. LGP confers additional rights upon the defender. Specifically, the player is allowed to move laterally or obliquely, raise hands and/or jump vertically, or turn around/duck.

A player who does not establish ILGP has the right to any spot on the floor provided that he gets there first without illegally contacting an opponent, but none of the additional rights named above. For example, if this player is moving laterally at the time of the contact, the proper call would be a blocking foul.

Does that help clarify it for you?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 25, 2007, 09:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 39
I got it NR thanx...I should of read further to art 3.
__________________
All of my post are for NFHS rules
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 25, 2007, 09:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABO77
I got it NR thanx...I should of read further to art 3.
Nah, it's just that most people have never had it explained to them that way before. Once you hear the logic, it makes sense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interference, Obstruction or Train Wreck?? tibear Baseball 30 Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:08am
Train Wreck, Malicious Contact, or Obstruction. Rattlehead Softball 22 Mon Jun 11, 2007 04:05pm
No-call train wreck? mplagrow Basketball 21 Sat Feb 11, 2006 09:36pm
Train wreck no call UW/Pacific zebraman Basketball 16 Tue Mar 22, 2005 09:24am
Train wreck gone? WestMichBlue Softball 13 Thu Feb 17, 2005 04:10pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1