The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 06, 2002, 02:50pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
This thread is getting pretty silly, but I gotta agree with Mick...by definition, a personal foul involves illegal contact...shoving the ball in someone's face is a non-contact situation, so it's gotta be a T, not a PC...the original situation is nothing - play on...just don't let the kid who blocked the shot taunt the one who just ate the ball...
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 06, 2002, 03:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 188
We all call pushing fouls throughout almost every game. Sometimes it's from the rear going after a rebound. A trip from behind on a fast break is a "push." Many are intentional and either soft or excessive... My point is pushing is part of the game and so is our interpretations of the contact we see.

It's not a T "every time!" Consider the amount of banging post players commit and at what point you blow a whistle. If a push using the ball exceeds that threshold of advantage/disadvantage, its player control. It goes to the next level if you deem it intentionally excessive, i.e. poke in face. Also, many kids are fast enough to push another player away without the defense getting a held ball.

It's immaterial to consider a ball or jersey intervening as "armor" to negate a whistle for a contact foul. If you apply this logic, basketball uniforms as we know it will cease to exist...being replaced with motocross pads and helmets. A trip from behind could be legal because the shoe did it, not the player.

BTW - You probably won't see a rule or case on this because some bookworm would have been pretty quick to bring it up.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 06, 2002, 03:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
This isn't "great position defense." Great defense would be grabbing the ball as the shooter is handing it to you, thus getting a jump or even a steal.
No, going for the steal is likely to get that fine defender called for a hack; so that fine defender doesn't pick up a silly fouls.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 06, 2002, 03:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally posted by rockyroad
This thread is getting pretty silly, but I gotta agree with Mick...by definition, a personal foul involves illegal contact...shoving the ball in someone's face is a non-contact situation, so it's gotta be a T, not a PC...the original situation is nothing - play on...just don't let the kid who blocked the shot taunt the one who just ate the ball...
Isn't pushing the defender away with the ball contact?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1