![]() |
Changing the bonus from shooting to an option
If there was a rules proposal to add an out of bounds throw in option on any foul in the bonus (i.e. the offended team can take the ball OOB instead of shooting a 1-1 or 2), what would you think of that?
I'm thinking that in situations this could help minimize fouling and all but eliminate fouls to stop the clock. Further, from what I've seen, free throw shooting is somewhere between poor and horrendous for many teams I work and I know some coaches that would gladly accept the ball for a throw in rather than chance a free throw late in the game. It would also force them to teach ball stealing techniques since constant fouling isn't going to get them anywhere. |
Quote:
It's an interesting idea. |
Quote:
Fouling at the end of the game and forcing teams to make FTs is an accepted practice. |
Quote:
As far as choice goes, I don't think you'll have a big delay in getting a choice. |
Quote:
|
I believe the NCAA tinkered with this a few years back in some of the pre season tournaments. I don't know what happened, but it hasn't resurfaced at that level.
|
Quote:
|
Instead of 1-1 if the team trailing in the last X minutes fouls, it should be two shots for fouls 7, 8, & 9 and three shots beginning with the tenth foul.
Or basketball could adopt a clock run-off rule such as football has. Any foul in the final Y minutes by the team behind in the score also results in ten seconds being deducted from the clock. Both of these would greatly discourage the tactic of fouling when behind late in the game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This was an experimental NCAA rule in the past; I forget the exact year. But since I never heard anything after that year, I can only assume it was not very a warmly received experiment. |
Frankly, I support the idea. Just think of how much it would "clean up" the end of a close game. Defenders would have no reason to foul unless it was the result of them going for the ball. We wouldn't have all this controversy about whether or not a foul was intentional at the end of a game.
A lot of guys say that fouling at the end is just "part of the game". Well - it shouldn't be. Committing fouls on purpose is not what Dr. Naismith envisioned. I ought to know - I asked him personally. ;) |
I still don't see why so many hate the idea of late game strategic fouls. Normally, at most, you'll see maybe 2 or 3 before one of three things happens.
1. It works, and the score gets tied. 2. The shooting team makes their shots and the lead gets so out of reach the trailing team doesn't bother. 3. The lead doesn't really change significantly, but the time continues to run off the clock, leading to the same result as #2. I just don't understand why some see this is a problem. |
The problem is that the introduction of the 3pt shot changed the situation dramatically. Before then it was not possible for a team to get more points on their possession than their opponents, if the opponents made their FTs. Now you can trade 2 for 3.
|
Quote:
If a team is not going to shoot the free throws and their opponents know it, why would they not be just as likely to foul? Coach: "Go for the steal. Be aggressive! If you foul, so what? They take the ball out and we try again." |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11pm. |