![]() |
Quote:
|
Popcorn. :D
Let's take a vote: who likes to read the same stuff from Rut over and over again? :p In my mind, there is value in replies (like Ruts) to situations like the OPs where his state is seemingly more restrictive about mechanics. There is also more value in other information, such as that published by the Fed, if only for the reason that there are likely more non-IL readers than there are IL readers. I appreciate when NevadaRef and Rut each qualify their responses with why they're responding as they do (except for learning about Dave Gannaway). I do agree with NV that Rut's pink statements are linked, and that Rut's commentary (2nd sentence) could be construed as his opinion rather than IHSA policy. IMHO, he didn't adequately clarify that this mechanic is part of the IHSA mechanic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It can only lead to problems if there are other sloppy aspects of the mechanics. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You and Nevada speak for all of us? Interesting. |
Quote:
|
I heard there's a waiting list.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The gentleman from Nevada stated in the paragraph where he used the word "we" that Rut should ---<i>".....leave the rest of the board to <b>those of us in the other 49 states plus DC</b>."</i> Soooooo, when did Nevada and <b>you</b> get elected as spokesman for "those of us in the other 49 states and DC"? I musta missed getting the memo on that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It seemed like the prudent course of action at the time. |
I don't know why JR's panties are in such a twist. According to his posted location, he isn't in one of those other 49 states or DC. :D
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10pm. |