Help with finding rules interpatation for NFHS test 1
 

My mind working a little slow right now, would someone direct me to the rule interpatation for these question on NFHS Test 1. thank you

#24
#31
#36
#64
#72
#76
#78

#24 8-1-2
#31 4-4-7b
#36 9-1 Penalty section 2a
#64 6-7-1, 5-8-3b
#72 5-6-2 exception 2
#76 4-44-2a1
#78 3-4-15

thank you,
I'm still have problem with #36 and #29

Explain the problems that you are having with these questions and I will try to help you understand them.

(Not jumping over you, Nevada - just bored, and feel like contributing.)

#29 = 9-1-4
#36 = I agree, this one was difficult because of the last sentence in 8-1-2, but I'm 99% sure on my answer.

#29 True, I was reading to much into the question.

#36 False? Wouldn't you first have a violation on team B for not occupying the lane. After that, If team B still does not occupy the first lane spaces we would have a T prior to the 2nd free throw attempt?

There is no violation on the first attempt if it is successful.

:confused: :confused: :confused:
the first attempt cannot be successful as opponents of the free thrower shall occupy the first lane space. If they are not there - an attempt cannot be made. Or am I wacco this morning?

Not during the RPP. Case book 9.1.2 is almost identical.

I wasn't aware it was following a TO or intermission so was reading my own scenario into it. On these tests - I should know better.

The test specifically says it's during the RPP.

The RPP is designed to allow the ball to become live and possibly have a violation rather than a T during certain delays. On the play in question, since the basket was made, there was no violation and no delay. Use the procedure again.

yep - went back and actually read the question not just posts. Sorry!

That's why I cited the penalty section as the reference in my initial response for the OP. I was trying to get him to read what the penalty is if the try is successful without directly telling him the answer.

#36 is is true -

9-1-2 & 10-1-5b are the references.

:(
You are 0-2 in the past five minutes. Either you don't understand these rules very well or you are purposely trying to give people the wrong answers. If it's the latter, that may not be a bad idea considering some of the folks who fish for answers here.

I respectfully disagree.

Which parts of those two references make the statement in #36 a true statement?

Umm, sorry but I am just putting in my two cents and I would never try to purposely give wrong answers......that my friend is a cold shot at me...

Then that leaves Nevada's first option.

I beg to differ.....like I said, just my two cents. Thats what this board is for correct? Many with a difference of opinions. Sorry if I didnt score a 100 on the test like the both of you and if I am not a walking rule book like the both of you.....some of us are indeed still learning.

I did not intend to take "a cold shot" at you. If you aren't sure about an answer, it would be nice if you would write, "I think that the answer is ... and here's why..."

What you posted came across as you making a statement with conviction and certainty, instead of expressing an opinion. Unfortunately, what you wrote was incorrect and since your post didn't include an explanation, I could only surmise why you wrote what you did.
(Plus you provided two incorrect answers in a very short time period.)

I did not mean to offend you. I offer my apologies and will try to help you understand the situations better if you would post your current thoughts.

No problem...