The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   fight and coach enters (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/39078-fight-coach-enters.html)

welref Tue Oct 23, 2007 03:55pm

fight and coach enters
 
If two bench personnel and the coach of Team B leave bench during a fight, Team A is awarded two free throws and the ball as penalty.

I have team A shooting 2 ft's for the bp leaving the bench and 2 ft's for the coach leaving the bench == 4 ft's. Team A's ball at the divison line opposite the table. Correct?

bob jenkins Tue Oct 23, 2007 03:56pm

Yes, unless the coach was beckoned and assuming that other penalties offset.

Nevadaref Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by welref
If two bench personnel and the coach of Team B leave bench during a fight, Team A is awarded two free throws and the ball as penalty.

I have team A shooting 2 ft's for the bp leaving the bench and 2 ft's for the coach leaving the bench == 4 ft's. Team A's ball at the divison line opposite the table. Correct?

Yes, the penalty section of 10-4-5 makes it clear that an additional technical foul is charged to the head coach if he is an offender.

My state has a rule that the coach can come out without being beckoned and without penalty if he is helping to break up the fight or stop the altercation. If he is out there and being a problem then the normal penalty applies.

Ch1town Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by welref
I have team A shooting 2 ft's for the bp leaving the bench and 2 ft's for the coach leaving the bench == 4 ft's. Team A's ball at the divison line opposite the table. Correct?


& coach hits the showers but the two team members (bench personel) can remain seated on the bench.

bigdog5142 Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ch1town
& coach hits the showers but the two team members (bench personel) can remain seated on the bench.

Bench personnel stay on the bench? I thought they were disqualified with flagrant technical fouls and tossed. I'll have to look this up in the book.

Scrapper1 Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog5142
Bench personnel stay on the bench? I thought they were disqualified with flagrant technical fouls and tossed. I'll have to look this up in the book.

In high school, we don't eject players. We disqualify them. The reason for this is that we don't want teenagers left alone in a locker room or hallway without adult supervision. It's better to have them on the bench, still the head coach's responsibility, than angry, frustrated and alone in the locker room.

A player can be removed from the playing area if he/she continues to be a disruptive influence in the game. But when we do this, the player should be accompanied by an adult, I believe.

Nevadaref Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog5142
Bench personnel stay on the bench? I thought they were disqualified with flagrant technical fouls and tossed. I'll have to look this up in the book.

They are DQ'd, but non-adult personnel are restricted to the team bench after that. It is only adults who must leave the confines.

Ch1town Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:26pm

Ejected adult bench personnel shall leave the vicinity...

bigdog5142 Tue Oct 23, 2007 04:59pm

So, basically...it's just like they got their 5th foul...I had a coach go ballistic on me yesterday when I called a PF on a player with three fouls (giving her four) and then the player got T'd by my partner for slamming the ball on the floor, giving her five and DQ'ing her. I wish coaches would actually READ the rulebook!

Vinski Tue Oct 23, 2007 05:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ch1town
& coach hits the showers but the two team members (bench personel) can remain seated on the bench.

Are you sure the coach hits the showers? He will have 1 direct technical and 1 indirect at this point, if I’m not mistaken. I don’t believe this is enough to eject. Wouldn’t he need one more tech to get the boot? I've never been quite sure on this.

10-4-5
ART. 5 . . . Leave the confines of the bench during a fight or when a fight may break out.

NOTE: The head coach may enter the court only if beckoned by an official.

PENALTY: (Art. 5) Flagrant foul, disqualification of individual offender, but only one technical-foul penalty is administered regardless of the number of offenders. This one foul is also charged indirectly to the head coach. If the head coach is an offender, an additional flagrant technical foul is charged directly to the coach and penalized. When a simultaneous technical foul(s) by opponents occurs, the free throws are not awarded when the penalties offset.

NOTE: A single flagrant foul or the second technical foul charged to any bench personnel, other than the head coach, results in disqualification of the offender. A single flagrant foul, the second direct technical foul or the third technical (any combination of direct or indirect) charged to the head coach results in disqualification and ejection.

Adam Tue Oct 23, 2007 05:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog5142
So, basically...it's just like they got their 5th foul...I had a coach go ballistic on me yesterday when I called a PF on a player with three fouls (giving her four) and then the player got T'd by my partner for slamming the ball on the floor, giving her five and DQ'ing her. I wish coaches would actually READ the rulebook!

Some do. Most don't.

Adam Tue Oct 23, 2007 05:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinski
Are you sure the coach hits the showers? He will have 1 direct technical and 1 indirect at this point, if I’m not mistaken. I don’t believe this is enough to eject. Wouldn’t he need one more tech to get the boot? I've never been quite sure on this.

Coach has a single Flagrant; that's all it takes.

Jurassic Referee Tue Oct 23, 2007 05:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinski
Are you sure the coach hits the showers? He will have 1 direct technical and 1 indirect at this point, if I’m not mistaken. I don’t believe this is enough to eject. Wouldn’t he need one more tech to get the boot? I've never been quite sure on this.

10-4-5
ART. 5 . . . Leave the confines of the bench during a fight or when a fight may break out.

NOTE: The head coach may enter the court only if beckoned by an official.

PENALTY: (Art. 5) This one foul is also charged indirectly to the head coach. If the head coach is an offender, an additional <font color = red>flagrant</font> technical foul is charged directly to the coach and penalized.

NOTE: <font color = red>A single flagrant foul</font>, the second direct technical foul or the third technical (any combination of direct or indirect) <font color = red>charged to the head coach results in disqualification and ejection.</font>

That's why the coach hits the showers. One flagrant foul of any kind is always instant disqualification.

Vinski Tue Oct 23, 2007 05:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
That's why the coach hits the showers. One flagrant foul of any kind is always instant disqualification.

Ahhhh… So it is. Thank JR. Always the careful eye. Thanks!

Mark Dexter Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
A player can be removed from the playing area if he/she continues to be a disruptive influence in the game. But when we do this, the player must be accompanied by an adult, I believe.

NFHS 10.5 (b)

BktBallRef Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:56pm

As long as the coach is being helpful is breaking up the fight/getting his players away, then I have beckoned him. Don't penalize the coach if he's doing the right thing.

Scrapper1 Wed Oct 24, 2007 07:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
A player can be removed from the playing area if he/she continues to be a disruptive influence in the game. But when we do this, the player must be accompanied by an adult, I believe.

NFHS 10.5 (b)

Thanks for the correction. I was 99% sure, but I didn't have the rule in front of me, so I hedged my bet with "should".

Scrapper1 Wed Oct 24, 2007 07:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef
As long as the coach is being helpful is breaking up the fight/getting his players away, then I have beckoned him.

I agree 100%.

rainmaker Wed Oct 24, 2007 07:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I agree 100%.

me too.

Jurassic Referee Wed Oct 24, 2007 09:29am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I agree 100%.

I agree 113%.

Mark Padgett Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I agree 113%.

That's fine, as long as you don't use decimal places. :p

mbyron Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
That's fine, as long as you don't use decimal places. :p

I believe he was using metric effort.

jer166 Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Some do. Most don't.

As a coach also, I never realized how ignorant most coaches are of the actual rules of the game until I began to officiate.

M&M Guy Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jer166
As a coach also, I never realized how ignorant most coaches are of the actual rules of the game until I began to officiate.

jer166, we'll be happy to welcome you over from the Dark Side. :)

Dan_ref Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I agree 113%.

I'll raise you to 138%

jer166 Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
jer166, we'll be happy to welcome you over from the Dark Side. :)

Thankee kindly... :)

Scrapper1 Wed Oct 24, 2007 01:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jer166
As a coach also, I never realized how ignorant most coaches are of the actual rules of the game until I began to officiate.

The problem is that coaches truly believe that they know the rules. That's why they get so upset. It's because they really are sure that you missed the rule.

I was in a class for teaching the rules to people who wanted to become referees. Lots of former players and coaches in the class. After the first hour of the class, they took a break and I overheard a coach tell the instructor, "Man, I've been a real jerk for the last 6 years."

After just one hour, he realized that he really had NO IDEA of what the rules were. But they're all SURE that they know them better than we do.

stmaryrams Wed Oct 24, 2007 01:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
In high school, we don't eject players. We disqualify them. The reason for this is that we don't want teenagers left alone in a locker room or hallway without adult supervision.

Partner had a situation where two players were sent to the locker room, changed and got into another fight out in the hallway outside of the gym. Before it was over the police were called in.

force39 Wed Oct 24, 2007 08:18pm

I have been told that when a fight breaks out stand back and take numbers down on who is involved, whether they come off the bench, etc.

If this is the case who stops the fight?:eek:

PYRef Wed Oct 24, 2007 08:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by force39
I have been told that when a fight breaks out stand back and take numbers down on who is involved, whether they come off the bench, etc.

If this is the case who stops the fight?:eek:

Not the officials. It's not your job to break it up, and no good can come from getting in between.

Splute Wed Oct 24, 2007 09:14pm

I agree with PYRef. If you try to break it up, a player would have a perfect opportunity to deck you and say it was an accident. Or worse, a player could get hurt and sue you..... no good can come out of it. I recommend NEVER touching a player.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1