Lack of Action Mechanic
We had our state meeting tonight regarding rules changes and the normal blah, blah, blah. Our state interpreter has always hated the lack of action (edit - I made a mistake when originally posted - I meant closely guarded) mechanic with the arms extended. Every year he has always demonstrated this mechanic and informed us that this is NOT an accepted HS mechanic. He's on the national rules committe and very knowledgeable about the rules - but has a personal vendeta against this mechinic.
He told us in no-uncertain-terms tonight that in WV we will NOT be using this mechanic. He also called out several other states that would not be using this mechanic. How many of you are not using it in your state? |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Lack of Action mechanic?
Are you talking about the "not closely guarded mechanic?" This mechanic that the NFHS has finally adopted as official is not the same as the old lack of action signal that I think your interpreter dislikes. I personally never liked the not closely guarded signal--if I'm not counting--the defender is not within 6ft of the guy he is trying to defend. But others have used the "not closely guarded signal" for years and I guess the Fed finally gave in.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You do not need a rulebook to clarify this. This was a college mechanic and that is all it was used for, clarification.
Peace |
Quote:
1) Closely guarded, and I'm counting 2) Not closely guarded, and I'm not counting then there'd be no need for a signal. But, there's a third possibility: 3) Closely guarded, and I'm not paying attention, so I'm not counting. The signal tells the coach that you have situation 2, not situation 3. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32am. |