No, I have not contacted him yet about either play. Why not? Because he is actually on the current NFHS rules committee. So if the NFHS releases something about these situations, then I'll know his take. If the NFHS doesn't put out anything, then his opinion is just that of another HS official in NV.

If you wish to contact him, his name and picture appear in the front of the 2007-08 NFHS rules book. With that info it's not that hard to do an internet search for his email or look him up on the NV website.

I remember being taught, in our First Aid class, that anytime you had an injured individual lying on their back...

you should "roll them over" on their side so that the vomit, blood, etc. can escape to prevent them from choking to death.

Does this have anything to do with the discussion? ;)

More "roll over" stuff...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PXvg8uCy0KE

I get it. He's only on the current FED rules committee and he's only your state interpreter. Sooooooooo......... there's no reason to ask him because your opinion is more valid anyway than any old rules committee member/state interpreter. After all, his opinion is only the same as a first year official in Nevada.

Now who was it that admonished Rainmaker above by stating "If you didn't ask about it and are unwilling to, just say so."?:confused:

Iirc someone also posted above "I'm only concerned with learning the truth about how the NFHS wants this play officiated".

And, of course this person whose knowledge is unsurpassed, as we've been told, also pontificated <i>"It is important that you are willing to entertain new ideas and aren't closed off to considering things in a different light. That is the path to improvement. So many people are convinced that the way that they have always done it is the right way and the only way. They come up with certain standards on their own, which aren't solidly grounded in the rules then hold onto them tremendously when confronted.by another point of view simply because that has been their way of thinking for such a long time.It is often hard to let go of previously held convictions and learn new ones."</i> Boy, I'll bet the all-knowing sage that wrote that would never dream of <b>NOT</b> contacting an NFHS official rules source to get a ruling on something being disputed.

Iow, do as I say, not as I do. For some reason, you remind me of Reggie Jackson and his expounding of the "Magnitude of Me". The only difference is that you're <b>much</b> more verbose than Reggie.

Didn't Reggie perform in the clutch though?

Peace

Sure did. That's why he <b>deserved</b> to be called "Mr. October", like him or not.

George Steinbrenner finally said about 20 years after the fact that unloading Reggie was the worst mistake that he ever made as the Yankees owner. In light of his many mistakes, that was a heckuva statement to make.

Nevada is no Reggie.:D

Yikes! :eek:

This should only be done if you're absolutely sure that the person has no neurological injuries (which can be hard to rule out) or once the person actually starts vomiting or hemorrhaging.

You've been talking to Mrs. NevadaRef?? :eek:

Oh, dear, now I'm going to get a personal e-mail from Brad about my postings...

yep...but, the point was about the "turning over" thing and what "turning over" means to different people....aw never mind.

What does all of this have to do with the price of tea in China or the traveling rule. I think it's time to shut this one down. Lot of personal thus comng out, Reggie Jackson, owe my goodness, shut it down before Rainmaker and NevadaRef has another breakdown in communications.:D