![]() |
Quote:
If my voice makes a light bulb go on over a kid's head, that's preventive. If my voice doesn't help and the kid commits the infraction, then it's not preventive and I have to go to the penalty. The penalty is NEVER preventive, because it's applied AFTER the infraction. If you PREVENT the infraction, you don't need the penalty. Writing a speeding ticket is not preventive law enforcement. A state trooper driving in the middle lane at 65 mph is preventive law enforcement. Just by being there, s/he is preventing most people from speeding. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
2) And if you don't prevent the infraction, how can it be "preventive"? Are you really saying that, in the play being discussed, instituting an expanded penalty to a normal live ball foul by adding an <b>EXTRA</b> penalty(second shot maybe + possession) for fouling a thrower OOB isn't preventive in nature? |
Quote:
Name me one rule...any rule....in the current FED or NCAA rule book that <b>wasn't</b> put in place to prevent players, coaches, bench personnel, etc. from performing the applicable act associated with that rule. The rules say "don't do that, and if you do, you'll be penalized". |
Quote:
You are being silly. |
This is a simple "type/token" confusion.
(1) Penalties are in the rule book to prevent certain types of act. (2) Imposing a penalty for a foul or violation obviously cannot prevent the token (or instance) that one whistled. The truth of (2) does not undercut the truth of (1). The idea of such preventive officiating as "get out of the middle!" depends on the idea in (1). |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Good grief. Those of you who are fighting this are simply being difficult. I'm done with this thread. |
Quote:
THAT's what is preventative. If it wasn't for the threat of a penalty I would roll down my window and throw my beer can at the trooper as I sped by him. As for the little bulb you turn on for the player...there's another word for that: coaching. |
The penalties in force are what we like to call "deterrents." Deterrents are, by nature, preventative. The intentional foul is a deterrent. The penalties are increased from standard personal fouls because the rules committee wants to deter players from doing things like reaching across the OOB line and fouling the thrower.
I can see how maybe the penalties for traveling, personal fouls, and backcourt violations might not be considered preventative deterrents. TFs and IFs, however, must be considered preventative deterrents. |
Quote:
The bright side is that it looks like we've chased Skippy back to the Volleyball forum where he belongs.:D |
Quote:
http://eieiofootball.com/uploaded_im...dog-790261.gif please please please please |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47pm. |