New Rule

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Old School

I lot of freaking you don't have a clue in your words. Who are you trying to convince so bad that you have to repeat yourself over and over? Actually, I'm glad you feel that way because that just makes you look so much worse then you actually are. How's the kool-aid today?

OS:

JR's most recent posts do what you either cannot do or will not due, and this is quote chapter and verse to defend his position. You just make things up to suit your "ignorant of the rules" positions. You are not a basketball official. You are a troll. Please leave our forum so that people who really want to learn can learn.

MTD, Sr.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Old School

Only if you have short-sided, little brand-size disease.

Eek!! Gotta admit, short-sized, little brand-size disease sounds way scary. What treatments are available?

Originally Posted by Old School

What you’re actually trying to do is to make a criminal out of someone who cares for the game more than you do, which to me is a criminal act in itself. You just hate on me because i come at this game from a different prospective.

There's no way anyone could imitate that, folks. I think OS wins the contest all on his/her own

Originally Posted by Old School

Try not to hurt yourself taking that apart gentlemen and ladies.

Why not write things sensibly in the first place, and then we don't have to do all these backflips and stuff.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

Eek!! Gotta admit, short-sized, little brand-size disease sounds way scary. What treatments are available?

I don't think even I have meds for that!!!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

I don't think even I have meds for that!!!

Wouldn't be for lack of begging, though.

[Old School]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

Why not write things sensibly in the first place, and then we don't have to do all these backflips and stuff.

I like seeing you guys do backflips, it's entertaining as hell. Makes my day....

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

OS: JR's most recent posts do what you either cannot do or will not due, and this is quote chapter and verse to defend his position.

Therein lies the problem. You can't think beyond the book. You get aproximately 2 feet away from the book and you become ignorant, dumb as a rock because now, you don't know what to do. That's when the name calling starts. The rulebook, any rulebook, the bible has to be able to stand up to criticism. If not, don't hate me because your rulebook/bible is not sound. For instance: you can not legally catch and shoot with .3 seconds or less on the clock. However, you can legally run a play with 00.0 showing on the clock. Nice.

You just make things up to suit your "ignorant of the rules" positions. You are not a basketball official. You are a troll. Please leave our forum so that people who really want to learn can learn.

Sometimes you have to do that Mark. Sometimes you have to defend your call even if it's wrong. I'm a great defender of my calls. Most times I'm right but occassionally I do kick the call. You know what that means Mark, that means I'm not perfect. That's right, I forgot, on this forum you have to be perfect to be a referee. I guess I am not a referee because I know I'm not perfect. However, I do get to officate some great games.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Old School

I like seeing you guys do backflips, it's entertaining as hell. Makes my day....

Typical troll.....not an official and makes stoopid posts just to get the real officials going.......iow JMO from McGriffs redux......

At least he admitted why he posts on this site.....19 pages later.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Typical troll.....not an official and makes stoopid posts just to get the real officials going.......iow JMO from McGriffs redux......

Also, another reason to just ignore him/her.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Old School

... has to be able to stand up to criterism.

That's the second time you mentioned "criterism". Are you sure you're not from Wyoming? Try pulling some of that "criterism" here in Oregon and you're going to jail, buddy! It's a baaaaaaaaaaaaahhhd thing!

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

That's the second time you mentioned "criterism". Are you sure you're not from Wyoming? Try pulling some of that "criterism" here in Oregon and you're going to jail, buddy! It's a baaaaaaaaaaaaahhhd thing!

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Old School

If not, don't hate me because your rulebook/bible is not sound. For instance: you can not legally catch and shoot with .3 seconds or less on the clock. However, you can legally run a play with 00.0 showing on the clock. Nice.

And that would be because it is physically impossible to catch and shoot the ball in 0.3 seconds or less...so you use something that can't happen to try to show that the rulebook has flaws?? That makes no sense...

Didn't really care about his opinion on this, just wanted to be able to get in on this really long, ridiculous thread!!

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Didn't really care about his opinion on this, just wanted to be able to get in on this really long, ridiculous thread!!

Hey, welcome!

Since you're the last one here, was it your turn to bring the chips?

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Hey, welcome!

Since you're the last one here, was it your turn to bring the chips?

Dang...knew I forgot something!!