![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The Fed has issued a case play to illustrate the way the rule is to be implemented. Here is the link: http://www.nfhs.org/web/2006/08/basketball.aspx
Click on the comments to 2007/2008 rule changes and the case play is there. :) |
I am going to regret this I know -
But OS the reason for this is right there in black and white for all to see - "The previous rule could possibly reward a defnsive team for commiting a violation, especially durring an alternating possession throw in" Sometime you should just admit you were in error and move on! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
4.42.5 SITUATION: Team A is awarded an alternating-possession throw-in. A1’s throw-in pass is illegally kicked by B2. RULING: As a result of B2’s kicking violation, Team A is awarded a throw-in at the designated spot nearest to where the violation occurred. Since the throw-in was not contacted "legally," the throw-in had not ended. Therefore, the arrow remains with Team A for the next alternating-possession throw-in. (6-4-4) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46am. |