|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: When "talking heads" are harshly criticized on the forum, you think: | |||
| announcers ignorantly criticize officials, lack rules knowledge, and deserve it |
   
|
41 | 59.42% |
| announcers create controversy, generate listeners and are a necessary evil |
  
|
8 | 11.59% |
| criticizing announcers on an officials' forum protects the game of basketball |
  
|
2 | 2.90% |
| criticizng "talking heads" is therapeutic, so who cares? |
  
|
4 | 5.80% |
| dumping on another profession can make your profession look bad |
  
|
10 | 14.49% |
| (Yawn) What was the question? |
  
|
15 | 21.74% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Mon Apr 09, 2007, 04:11am
|
|||
|
|||
|
When "talking heads" are harshly criticized on the forum, you think:
I am interested in what the general feeling is among forum members towards the harsh comments directed at color commentators and such. Bashing these guys can appear to be widely accepted, but I wonder if the majority of members view "talking heads" with far less anomosity than it might appear?
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"? | PAT THE REF | Baseball | 60 | Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm |
| Why "general" and "additional"? | Back In The Saddle | Basketball | 1 | Sat Oct 07, 2006 02:56pm |
| "Balk" or "Ball" | johnnyg08 | Baseball | 9 | Fri Aug 18, 2006 08:26am |
Threaded Mode
