The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 17, 2007, 07:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
Ref Explains Advantage/Disadvantage

What do you guys think of this attempt to explain Advantage/Disadvantage?

REF - It all boils down to the fundamental philosophy of the rules, commonly referred to as "The Tower Philosophy." It was named in honor of an old timer by the name of Oswald Tower who is credited with explaining that the rules are based on the concept of "Advantage and Disadvantage."

LIB.com - "Advantage and Disadvantage?" Do you mean "no harm, no foul?"

REF - Well, that's an extreme way of looking at it. Actually, it has to do with the overall concept of trying to create a "balance of play" with "equal opportunity" between offense and defense, small player and tall player. Ideally, the rules create an atmosphere of sportsmanship and fair play with emphasis on cleverness and skill. To that end, no player or team should be permitted to gain an "advantage" (or be put at a "disadvantage") that is not intended by the rules. The best referees understand this notion and apply it throughout the game, no matter what level they are working.

LIB.com - So, it's more than just "rules"......there's actually a philosophy involved.

REF - Exactly. There's plenty to keep an eye on, to be sure, but you really want to conduct a game within the context of this philosophy. It takes a clear understanding of both the rules AND the philosophy to know when the whistle needs to be blown and when you can "chew on it" (not blow). The RULES BOOK gives the referee all the ammunition needed to handle any situation that may develop during a game. But the game is about players and teachers (coaches). It is NOT about an official playing "Deputy Dog" on the court and blowing the whistle for every little infraction.

LIB.com - But, players, coaches and even spectators love to talk about "consistency" when it comes to referees. What's going on there?

REF - The problem, if there is a problem, goes back to your first question. The best referees have gained an understanding of the "spirit and intent" of the rules and do a wonderful and CONSISTENT job of administering the rules using this concept. Unfortunately, the players, coaches and spectators do not usually see the game from the same perspective as a referee. The referees are expected to make instantaneous decisions in the midst of an environment where everyone else tends to be extremely biased in their views and cannot see any other perspectives but their own. Too often, it seems, referees are labeled as "inconsistent" when, in fact, they may have done a marvelously "consistent" job of handling difficult decisions within the spirit and intent of the rules.


The entire interview can be found here:

http://www.longislandbasketball.com/AskTheRef2.html
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2007, 12:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 44
Whoever that guy is, he sure likes to hear himself talk.

It takes maximum three sentences what it took four paragraphs for that guy to say.
__________________
See you in the funny pages!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2007, 01:41pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by mplagrow
LIB.com - So, it's more than just "rules"......there's actually a philosophy involved.

REF - Exactly. There's plenty to keep an eye on, to be sure, but you really want to conduct a game within the context of this philosophy.
I don't like this answer, because the "philosophy" is in the rule. A foul is defined as contact that causes a disadvantage. There's not a rule and then a separate philosophy.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2007, 02:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by mplagrow
Unfortunately, the players, coaches and spectators do not usually see the game from the same perspective as a referee. The referees are expected to make instantaneous decisions in the midst of an environment where everyone else tends to be extremely biased in their views and cannot see any other perspectives but their own. Too often, it seems, referees are labeled as "inconsistent" when, in fact, they may have done a marvelously "consistent" job of handling difficult decisions within the spirit and intent of the rules.
This was great!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2007, 05:56pm
I drank what?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 1,085
Send a message via MSN to w_sohl
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Canuck
Whoever that guy is, he sure likes to hear himself talk.

It takes maximum three sentences what it took four paragraphs for that guy to say.
It's an interview, gotta have meat to be able to print it.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2007, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkjenning
This was great!
That is an understatement!!!!
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2007, 05:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkjenning
This was great!
It was obviously the quote of an experienced ref. It was well stated. Or as I like to put it, when fans or coaches think they see something because of their bias, "I don't have a dog in this fight!"
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2007, 06:00pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I don't like this answer, because the "philosophy" is in the rule. A foul is defined as contact that causes a disadvantage. There's not a rule and then a separate philosophy.
And.....it should be made clear that the advantage/disadvantage philosophy(otherwise known as NFHS rule 4-27) also applies to fouls only, not violations.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2007, 07:11pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Never Say Never ....

From Jurassic Referee: "It should be made clear that the advantage/disadvantage philosophy(otherwise known as NFHS rule 4-27) also applies to fouls only, not violations".

From Jurassic Referee (a few weeks ago): "Just for the record, I personally don't think that you can take any kind of simplistic view and apply it wholely to game situations. There are certain violations that I think that even the FED rulesmakers would probably agree, if you twisted their arms, that some discretion(read: advantage/disadvantage) is needed to make an appropriate call. Examples might be 3-seconds and the 10-second count on a free-throw shooter. My point all along was that you just couldn't try to apply advantage/disadvantage indiscriminately to violations. Most violations must be called".

I hope that Jurassic Referee and I can agree on this: "Most violations must be called". I would like to add that almost all violations must be called, with almost all meaning, pretty much all violations must be called, but every once in a great while, the principle of advantage/disadvantage can be used, with great discretion, to not call a violation. Can we agree on that?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2007, 08:35pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
From Jurassic Referee: "It should be made clear that the advantage/disadvantage philosophy(otherwise known as NFHS rule 4-27) also applies to fouls only, not violations".

From Jurassic Referee (a few weeks ago): "Just for the record, I personally don't think that you can take any kind of simplistic view and apply it wholly to game situations. There are certain violations that I think that even the FED rulesmakers would probably agree, if you twisted their arms, that some discretion(read: advantage/disadvantage) is needed to make an appropriate call. Examples might be 3-seconds and the 10-second count on a free-throw shooter. My point all along was that you just couldn't try to apply advantage/disadvantage indiscriminately to violations. Most violations must be called".

I hope that Jurassic Referee and I can agree on this: "Most violations must be called". I would like to add that almost all violations must be called, with almost all meaning, pretty much all violations must be called, but every once in a great while, the principle of advantage/disadvantage can be used, with great discretion, to not call a violation. Can we agree on that?
Yup, sure can. My point was that if you're going to post a general philosophy, like the Towers, then you should also maybe make general guidelines while doing so. Imo, a general guideline for the Tower Philosophy is that it applies to fouls and not violations.

Does that sound reasonable?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2007, 09:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Yup, sure can. My point was that if you're going to post a general philosophy, like the Towers, then you should also maybe make general guidelines while doing so. Imo, a general guideline for the Tower Philosophy is that it applies to fouls and not violations.

Does that sound reasonable?
Generally.
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advantage/Disadvantage drinkeii Basketball 102 Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:13am
Advantage Disadvantage, Etc. BillyMac Basketball 16 Thu Feb 22, 2007 03:07pm
Help me with advantage/disadvantage lmeadski Basketball 21 Thu Feb 16, 2006 03:22pm
Advantage/Disadvantage is over rated Hartsy Basketball 31 Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:37am
Advantage/Disadvantage rainmaker Basketball 21 Thu Jul 13, 2000 05:50pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1