The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   How do you call this? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/32099-how-do-you-call.html)

ranjo Thu Feb 22, 2007 07:37am

How do you call this?
 
I have seen a similar thread in the past years, but can't find it now and can't remember how it ended.

A1 takes a short jumper from the free throw line. B1 turns toward the basket anticipating a possible rebound. The ball bounces off the backboard toward A1 who secures it and drives into the lane for a layup, but in the process contacts B1 from behind, knocking him to the floor as he makes the layup.

My problem is this: B1 did not have a legal guarding position as he was not facing his opponet, but he did get where he was first and he did get there legally.

Minor contact I would let go, but I'm not sure how to interpet the rules when there is excessive contact.

Block? Charge? No Call? How have some of you handled this?:confused:

Terrapins Fan Thu Feb 22, 2007 07:49am

I got an offensive foul ( player control ). no basket and we are going the other way, no free throws.

Jurassic Referee Thu Feb 22, 2007 07:52am

Rule 4-23-1--<i>"Every player is entitled to a spot on the playing court provided such player gets there first without illegally contacting an opponent."</i> LGP doesn't affect that premise. If they now get run over by an opponent after attaining their <b>legal</b> spot, you can't call a foul on the player being run over. The options are either a no-call or a foul on the player doing the charging, depending on whether the contact was illegal or incidental.

ranjo Thu Feb 22, 2007 08:54am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Rule 4-23-1--<i>"Every player is entitled to a spot on the playing court provided such player gets there first without illegally contacting an opponent."</i> LGP doesn't affect that premise. If they now get run over by an opponent after attaining their <b>legal</b> spot, you can't call a foul on the player being run over. The options are either a no-call or a foul on the player doing the charging, depending on whether the contact was illegal or incidental.


The good thing is that after it happened last night, I did call it correctly based on your interpertation. I just needed someone to to put it into perspective and help me differentiate between LGP and legal spot.

Thanks!

Nevadaref Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:20am

ranjo,
Do you have the Simplified & Illustrated book? My most recent copy is from 2005-06. Your play is depicted on page 27. The shooter is crashing into the back of a defender who is facing the basket and not the player with the ball. Here is the caption:

4-19-6 Number 5 has legal position on the court before No. 4 becomes airborne. The foul is on No. 4, the goal does not count if it is made because it is a player-control foul. A player-control foul causes the ball to become dead immediately. Number 4 is an airborne shooter after releasing the ball on a try until he returns to the floor.

Camron Rust Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:54pm

Just remember that LGP's only purpose is to allow the defense to be moving/jumping at the time of contact and still be able to draw a charge. If the player is not moving/jumping, they don't need LGP.

ranjo Thu Feb 22, 2007 03:30pm

[QUOTE=Nevadaref]ranjo,
Do you have the Simplified & Illustrated book? My most recent copy is from 2005-06. Your play is depicted on page 27. The shooter is crashing into the back of a defender who is facing the basket and not the player with the ball. Here is the caption:



I don't own the book nor have I ever had the oportunity to look at one, but I take it you would highly recomend it? I'm all for Simple & Illustrated!

WhistlesAndStripes Thu Feb 22, 2007 03:34pm

I recommend the comic book, as we so affectionately call it, to all new officials for the first couple of years.

deecee Thu Feb 22, 2007 03:38pm

you could also learn just as much from Forget Paris

WhistlesAndStripes Thu Feb 22, 2007 03:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee
you could also learn just as much from Forget Paris

Nice flick.

lookin2improve Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:16pm

Would you apply the same rules interp for a sit where A1 and B1 fighting for rebound. B1 goes to the floor. A1 secures the ball and then subsequently falls over B1...travel or foul?:confused:

JugglingReferee Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes
Nice flick.


I like the parts where Billy's dad reads all the businesses as the car drives.

"Toy-yo-ta. Barber shop. Gino's Pizza. ................." Yup, good flick.

Is Billy Crystal really 5'6", becuase that's how tall Spud Webb is, isn't he?

Nevadaref Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookin2improve
Would you apply the same rules interp for a sit where A1 and B1 fighting for rebound. B1 goes to the floor. A1 secures the ball and then subsequently falls over B1...travel or foul?:confused:

I would call what it says in the old casebook play.

Mark Padgett Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee
you could also learn just as much from Forget Paris

I'd like to forget Paris. Nicole, too. :rolleyes:

Adam Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
I'd like to forget Paris. Nicole, too. :rolleyes:

And her little dog, too. Oh wait, that's what you meant.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1