The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Call it or not? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/31888-call-not.html)

Swingandamiss Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:18pm

Call it or not?
 
3 man crew, I am U1. High School Varsity tourney. Team A is ahead by 10, less than 2 minutes left. They do the old 4 corners, spread the court and pass the ball around. B1 follows the ball, running from player to player, trying to commit a foul, but Team A gets rid of the ball each time before he gets there, he gives up each time and does not make contact with any of Team A's players. I have no call, no contact, no foul. B1 finally slams into A4, hard, in R's area, he calls foul. We shoot the ft's, game ends, we go to dressing room. My R, vet, IAABO of 9-10 years says, "You gotta call that. They want the foul." I say no contact, no foul. He tells me I have to call it because if I don't things get out of hand. I disagree, U2 agrees with me and we get into a pretty heated argument in the dressing room. Now we have to go back out and call 4 more games , in about 30 minutes. So, do I call the foul or not? I still say no contact, no foul.

BktBallRef Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:28pm

If it's a foul in the 1st quarter, it's a foul in the 4th.

Mark Padgett Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:55pm

If it's not a foul in the first quarter, it's not a foul in the fourth. Ask yourself this - if you call a personal foul without any contact, what mechanic would you use? I guess you could use the illegal use of hands mechanic but just miss your arm when you do it. :confused:

Texas Aggie Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:24am

No contact, no foul, but you might use a little more discretion in what contact it takes to draw a whistle if you think it might escalate if you don't call.

In terms of same 1st quarter/4th quarter, I think there's a difference between a team trying to foul to stop the clock and just being overly aggressive. However, I can see a difference of opinion on this issue and am interested in hearing other thoughts.

Camron Rust Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:26am

No contact, no foul.

The offense deserves the advantage of running out the clock if they can keep the ball away from the defense. If B takes it too far when they finally do make contact, make the call accordingly.

rainmaker Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust
The offense deserves the advantage of running out the clock if they can keep the ball away from the defense.

Absolutely. And if offense is successful and defense fouls very roughly out of frustration, it's gonna be an intentional. And if the coach complains that I "gotta call the little ones" I say, "They've gotta commit the little ones."

Jurassic Referee Fri Feb 16, 2007 01:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
And if the coach complains that I "gotta call the little ones" I say, <font color = red>"They've gotta commit the little ones."</font>

Somebody said that about Chuck once too.

I think it was me.

Camron Rust Fri Feb 16, 2007 06:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Somebody said that about Chuck once too.

I think it was me.

Hey, I think his disappearance story was just a front. He really has been committed!! :D

JugglingReferee Fri Feb 16, 2007 08:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swingandamiss
3 man crew, I am U1. High School Varsity tourney. Team A is ahead by 10, less than 2 minutes left. They do the old 4 corners, spread the court and pass the ball around. B1 follows the ball, running from player to player, trying to commit a foul, but Team A gets rid of the ball each time before he gets there, he gives up each time and does not make contact with any of Team A's players. I have no call, no contact, no foul. B1 finally slams into A4, hard, in R's area, he calls foul. We shoot the ft's, game ends, we go to dressing room. My R, vet, IAABO of 9-10 years says, "You gotta call that. They want the foul." I say no contact, no foul. He tells me I have to call it because if I don't things get out of hand. I disagree, U2 agrees with me and we get into a pretty heated argument in the dressing room. Now we have to go back out and call 4 more games , in about 30 minutes. So, do I call the foul or not? I still say no contact, no foul.

So in the cases where the no contact is in your primary, you have no contact, and the R wants a foul?

Seems to me he wants you to call a T. :D

Ref Daddy Fri Feb 16, 2007 09:41am

No contact - no foul.

Frustrated foul in the paint - intentional.

We apply rules .... not game strategy.

Bad Zebra Fri Feb 16, 2007 09:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swingandamiss
..."You gotta call that. They want the foul." I say no contact, no foul. He tells me I have to call it because if I don't things get out of hand. I disagree, U2 agrees with me and we get into a pretty heated argument in the dressing room...

How does this "veteran" last as long as he did with this philosophy? The concept of contact and fouling is about as fundamental as it gets. He wants to call fouls on the defense based on their desired outcome? Talk about a slippery slope.

JoeTheRef Fri Feb 16, 2007 09:52am

What a helluva offensive strategy to get rid of the ball and avoid any contact from the defense and kill the clock. Well coached. If the ball was in the "Vet's" primary does he penalize this brilliant coaching tactic? On the other hand, either the defensive player or the coach needs to be at the end of the bench because somebody didn't do their job.:D

Junker Fri Feb 16, 2007 09:52am

No contact, no foul. You don't want to penalize the offense for being smart and moving the ball well. I'm sure they would have liked to have more points on the scoreboard, but you can't just give those to a team beacuse they want it.

Vinski Fri Feb 16, 2007 09:56am

My rule book tells me that contact is required for a personal foul to be committed. I’ve seen games where these “phantom” fouls are called in similar situations and it is tremendously frustrating to the kids and coach. If that ref wanted a foul called, let him call it.

JoeTheRef Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinski
My rule book tells me that contact is required for a personal foul to be committed. I’ve seen games where these “phantom” fouls are called in similar situations and it is tremendously frustrating to the kids and coach. If that ref wanted a foul called, let him call it.

Vin, I've seen this as well, and I've also seen it where the ref called the touchy foul because he thought the team was trying to foul and they weren't. Coached asked him how is that touch a foul now and it wasn't for the other 3 quarters. Ref responded, "I was helping you out, you were the ones trying foul". Coach: You're an idiot, we were playing good defense, not trying to foul. ONly thing I could do was switch my with my partner and put him opposite table for the free throws.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1