Liability Issue @ Ortonville

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I have not read anyone attacking the OPer in any way.

Well, Rut, GarthB did accuse the OP - a couple times - of having a problem with the gender of the substitute officials and implied that was his entire problem...I read it as an attack.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Well, Rut, GarthB did accuse the OP - a couple times - of having a problem with the gender of the substitute officials and implied that was his entire problem...I read it as an attack.

I read it as an observation.

[jdw3018]

Fair enough, though post #25 made my perception of his posts turn from observation to attack. JMO, though...

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Well, Rut, GarthB did accuse the OP - a couple times - of having a problem with the gender of the substitute officials and implied that was his entire problem...I read it as an attack.

I read that as an observation as well. Now that was not my original observation, but that does not mean I am correct. I guess if someone speaks their mind about something that has to be an attack.

Oh well, carry on with your little accusations.

Peace

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Well, Rut, GarthB did accuse the OP - a couple times - of having a problem with the gender of the substitute officials and implied that was his entire problem...I read it as an attack.

That's not accurate.

I did question whether part of his problem was with women officials. In his entire story, the only people he identified by gender were the women, despite his later claim that he'd have done the same if the officials were men. In reality, there were at least three men in his story, two coaches and the principal, and he didn't find it necessary to identify them by gender. I believe he has shown that part of his problem is that the "referees" were women.

However, I never concluded that this was his entire problem, only that it was involved. When he attempted to play the junior high attitude card, I pulled out of the conversation with him and placed him on my ignore list.

I don't see any of this as an attack.

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by GarthB

I don't see any of this as an attack.

It's all good. I don't agree with the premise of his post much in the first place, but just found the way I interpreted your "tone" (which obviously is impossible in the message board world) as something you've indicated it wasn't in post #25.

I'll definitely take your word for it!