![]() |
|
|
|||
Is it possible?
Is it possible to have time expired (0.0 seconds showing on the clock) and be shooting FTs? The horn did sound.
Seen a play tonight where a kid was fouled and they shot FTs. Another ref in the gym was explaining to some people that there should be at least 0.1 on the clock because if there was a foul - the foul had to occur prior to the horn sounding and therfore time should be remaining. I calmly said that this was possible. That if the try had left the shooter's hand and then the foul occured (which is what I saw, the shooter got hacked after the ball was gone) and the shooter was still an airborne shooter which he was that time could have expired. This is apparently what the officials saw or for whatever reason they allowed the FTs with the lane cleared and that was the end of the quarter. Correct? or is the other ref correct in saying time has to be put back on the clock? |
|
|||
Continuous Motion principles applies to an airborne shooter who has not yet returned to the floor. So here's a possiblity: The ball left the shooter's hands, time expired while the shot was in flight, the shooter was fouled on the return to the floor.
So, it is possible to have FTs with no time left on the clock, however, I can't speak as to this particular case, because I wasn't the official and didn't see the play. Last edited by NewNCref; Fri Jan 26, 2007 at 10:55pm. |
|
|||
In that order, no, the statement is false. You cannot have a foul called, and then have time run off the clock. The clock stops on the whistle, and becomes dead as soon as the try ends.
However, in the event that a foul was called, and the timer wasn't able to stop the clock in time, and the officials had no definite knowledge of the time the foul occurred, then I could see going with the FTs, and the period then ending. Last edited by NewNCref; Fri Jan 26, 2007 at 11:07pm. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|