![]() |
Warning/T for delay
conflicting language problem
4-47-2: .....for huddle by either team "and" contact with the free thrower 10-1-5c...........contact with the free thrower "or" a huddle............ The warning for delay section uses "and" while the penalty section 10 cites "or". 1. Which is it? 2. Can someone describe the "contact with the free thrower" game action that would precipitate the warning or penalty? |
Quote:
|
I don't think that the coaches are telling the players to do this. On the other hand, I don't think the coaches are telling the players NOT to do it.
If it bothers you, just mention it to the captains in the pre-game. Then, if it happens in the game, you can stop it as soon as you see one of the players moving towards the free-thrower. I don't think the players even want to do this anyway. It started as a congratulations for a sucessful free-throw. That seemed to put extra pressure on someone who misses the first shot by "its absence". Now, they think they need to do it after every shot. So, to answer your question: Don't warn or penalize it. Just let them know you aren't going to allow it. As rainmaker pointed out, it's not a big deal unless it is delaying the game. Plus, as you mentioned in the OP (4-47-2 & 10-1-5), the NFHS doesn't want this happening. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I really think that huddling of defensive/offensive players is getting out of hand. We need to step in and let them know we are not going to allow it...ONCE. If they do it again give them a warning, so actually we have told them twice, so when we whack them we have done our job. The warnings are in the book as tools for us to use, use them. These huddles are delaying the game, that is a fact. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
while we're at it, get them a kleenex. there's mucous on the nose.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Meaning: 4-47-2 is not saying both conditions must be met, it's providing a list of actions that fall under this rule. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32am. |