Who gets the T?
 

After a timeout, V35 breaks the huddle and comes directly on the floor without having reported before or during the timeout. Before the ball is put back in play, the scorer summons the official and the official issues a technicial foul. Who is the foul on? "Team"? Coach indirect? Player? If so, does it count toward the five for disqualification?

Substitute, counts toward 2 T's to ejection, 5 fouls to disqualification and team fouls to bonus.

NCAA rules: This is an indirect technical foul (10-3.9a) charged to V35. It does not count towards the five fouls for DQ, towards the 7/10 fouls for the bonus, or against the coach.

NFHS; It's an indirect on the head coach as well. Seat belt.

That is incorrect...check the penalty chart in the NFHS rule book page 73.;)

Looking at it right now.
Bench personnel/substitutes, enter court without permission; counts towards 1. 2 technicals, 5 personals, team foul count. Head coach assessed indirect T.

We have a sub, not bench personnel, look under substitutes this falls under failing to report entering without being beckoned...no indirect.

Had this occurred during an intermission, then it falls under bench personnel 4-34-2.

Just wondering, how could this happen during an intermission?

Disclosure. The only rule book I have here is 2005-2006. It says Subs and bench personnel in the same block, and includes entering without permission. Substitutes don't have their own block on page 73; they're considered bench personnel.

Was this another change this year that we weren't told about.

Snaqs - I'm looking at 05-06 (and 04-05) right now, and it has separate rows for substitutes and for bench personnel. Subs are the 5th row of the table and bench personnel are the 7th row. Looks the same as the 06-07.

If the team failed to send/report the sub(s) to the table to check in between periods.

So, when you don't KNOW who the "6th" player on floor is, who do you give the T to? Not sure about the rest of the country, but around here, the book does not keep track of who is in the game at every moment of time.

The team (10-1-6).

Kinda like in football, when you call a penalty for 12 men on the field and the coach asks "Who was the 12th man??" Jeez, coach, I didn't call that last play. Or an illegal formation call for fewer than 7 men on the line of scrimmage and the coach asks "Who was off the line?" Once again - I have at least 5 suspects.

2006-2007 NFHS rule book, Page 73,

Substitutes: Entering court; no reportl not beckoned -

Counts toward: 1. 2 Technicals 2. 5 personal 3. Team-foul count

It states nothing for the Head Coach assessed column.

Therefore, the "T" should be charged to the substitute only!

So in that case we charge an indirect to the head coach? (I don't have a rulebook with me right now)

Speaking of the table on page 73. On "Dunk or grasp basket" the rules citing is incorrect. It should be 10-3-4. :)

Nope, charged to the team and it counts toward the team-foul count.

The fifth item in the "Administrative" is "team not ready to start half."

And also speaking of the table on p. 73, how can a disqualified player ever be considered a substitute?

I see it now. That's what I get for multi-tasking.

Think of a DQ'd player sneaking back into the game and it not getting caught immediately. While he is playing, you would have to consider him a player, right?
4-34-4 is written to cover this screw-up:
"If entry is not legal, the substitute becomes a player when the ball becomes live."

I gotcha, but that row in the table on p. 73 is addressing USC/acts on the bench, specifically. Entering after being DQ'd isn't listed in either of the two sections where USC/acts are laid out in 10-3-7 and 10-4-1.

And besides, isn't that simply a direct technical fouls on the Head Coach when a DQ'd player is caught playing in the game - regardless of how long the player has been in? Or are you laying out a different type of scenario?

It is now, but it used to be a flagrant T on the kid. I was merely attempting to give you a situation in which you had to consider a DQ'd person a substitute or a player. That's all. I'm not even sure that I succeeded with my example. :)