The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Five second count on a drive (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/29590-five-second-count-drive.html)

Back In The Saddle Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:41pm

Five second count on a drive
 
We had an interesting discussion in our association meeting last night about the five second closely guarded count. Imagine that a dribbler gets head and shoulders past his defender on a drive to the basket only to be picked up by a secondary defender who was already within six feet (so at least one defender was continuously within six feet the whole time). Would you continue your count? If so, why? If not, why not? Would it make any difference to you if it were near the basket or 40 feet away?

Jurassic Referee Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
We had an interesting discussion in our association meeting last night about the five second closely guarded count. Imagine that a dribbler gets head and shoulders past his defender on a drive to the basket only to be picked up by a secondary defender who was already within six feet<font color = red> (so at least one defender was continuously within six feet the whole time)</font>. Would you continue your count? If so, why? If not, why not? Would it make any difference to you if it were near the basket or 40 feet away?

There's your answer right there.

From the RULING in casebook play 9.10.1SitB- "There is no requirement for the defensive player to remain the same during the count <b>as long as A1 is closely guarded throughout</b>".

It's a violation anywhere on the court. The dribbler only got head and shoulders past one defender, not both of them. If the other defender was within 6 feet, the count simply continues.

Dan_ref Tue Nov 21, 2006 01:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
There's your answer right there.

From the RULING in casebook play 9.10.1SitB- "There is no requirement for the defensive player to remain the same during the count <b>as long as A1 is closely guarded throughout</b>".

It's a violation anywhere on the court. The dribbler only got head and shoulders past one defender, not both of them. If the other defender was within 6 feet, the count simply continues.

cough cough...

Jurassic Referee Tue Nov 21, 2006 01:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
cough cough...

YeahYeahYeah......

It's a violation anywhere in the <b>frontcourt</b>, except for maybe Wimmen's basketball of which I know nuthin' about.

Larks Tue Nov 21, 2006 01:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
It's a violation anywhere on the court.

Dont Put that Pivot foot back down!!

ATXCoach Tue Nov 21, 2006 02:29pm

Wait, am i reading this correctly?

A1 dribbling around can guarded by B1, B2, and B3 each individually so long as one of them is always within six feet and the closely guarded count continues and does not restart with each change of defender???

Is the rule the same in NCAA and NCAA-W?

bob jenkins Tue Nov 21, 2006 02:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATXCoach
Wait, am i reading this correctly?

A1 dribbling around can guarded by B1, B2, and B3 each individually so long as one of them is always within six feet and the closely guarded count continues and does not restart with each change of defender???

Is the rule the same in NCAA and NCAA-W?

Yes, in FED.

In NCAA it must be the same defender -- when there's a switch, the count starts over.

ATXCoach Tue Nov 21, 2006 02:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Yes, in FED.

In NCAA it must be the same defender -- when there's a switch, the count starts over.

I did not know that. thanks for clearing it up.

rainmaker Tue Nov 21, 2006 06:40pm

I know I'll probably be beheaded for saying this, but you'd better check around in your area before you call this. I know what the strict letter of the law says, and I'm not saying that JR is incorrect in his interp. But I also know that some rules are called with local variations that directly contradict the book, and whether or not I or anyone else approve of this, that's the way it's done. I'd check with a local interpreter before i called this in any game.

Back In The Saddle Tue Nov 21, 2006 06:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
I know I'll probably be beheaded for saying this, but you'd better check around in your area before you call this. I know what the strict letter of the law says, and I'm not saying that JR is incorrect in his interp. But I also know that some rules are called with local variations that directly contradict the book, and whether or not I or anyone else approve of this, that's the way it's done. I'd check with a local interpreter before i called this in any game.

I'll just say that there was a rather spirited discussion about whether this should be called or not. Yes, the rule is clear. But is the intent of the rule to give the ball to the defense when the offense is actively advancing toward the basket?

Jurassic Referee Tue Nov 21, 2006 07:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
I'll just say that there was a rather spirited discussion about whether this should be called or not. Yes, the rule is clear. But is the intent of the rule to give the ball to the defense when the offense is actively advancing toward the basket?

The intent of the rule is to reward good defense. If a defender is in <b>front</b> of a dribbler that is actively advancing towards the basket, why should you penalize them for making that good defensive play?

Jurassic Referee Tue Nov 21, 2006 07:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
I know I'll probably be beheaded for saying this, but you'd better check around in your area before you call this. I know what the strict letter of the law says, and I'm not saying that JR is incorrect in his interp. But I also know that some rules are called with local variations that directly contradict the book, and whether or not I or anyone else approve of this, that's the way it's done. I'd check with a local interpreter before i called this in any game.

Are you inferring that Howard is teaching Portland officials to ignore that particular rule?

Lotto Tue Nov 21, 2006 07:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATXCoach
Wait, am i reading this correctly?

A1 dribbling around can guarded by B1, B2, and B3 each individually so long as one of them is always within six feet and the closely guarded count continues and does not restart with each change of defender???

Is the rule the same in NCAA and NCAA-W?

No. It is the same in NCAA-M only.

In NCAA-W there is no closely guarded count while A1 is dribbling, only while she is holding the ball. The count happens anywhere on the court, not just in the frontcourt.

rainmaker Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Are you inferring that Howard is teaching Portland officials to ignore that particular rule?

I'm not inferring anything, the reader infers, the speaker (or writer) implies!

Okay, well I had to do that since Mr. Annoying Grammar Guy has yet to be replaced.

No, not at all. Howard is a by the book kinda guy -- except for 3 seconds. But my point is exactly that in areas where there is a strong tradition of how to interpret things, it's best to go by that tradition, just like we use Howard's 3 second rule here, rather than the legality of the book.

Back In The Saddle Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
I'm not inferring anything, the reader infers, the speaker (or writer) implies!

Okay, well I had to do that since Mr. Annoying Grammar Guy has yet to be replaced.

How about Ms. Annoying Grammar Gal? :D

TimTaylor Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
I'm not inferring anything, the reader infers, the speaker (or writer) implies!

Okay, well I had to do that since Mr. Annoying Grammar Guy has yet to be replaced.

No, not at all. Howard is a by the book kinda guy -- except for 3 seconds. But my point is exactly that in areas where there is a strong tradition of how to interpret things, it's best to go by that tradition, just like we use Howard's 3 second rule here, rather than the legality of the book.

Gee Juulie, does that make you the annoying Grammer Gal?

Sorry.....I couldn't resist:D

Great to see you last night...it's been awhile! Now that test night (and we all hopefully passed) is over the courts are safe once again!

TimTaylor Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:45pm

OOPS! Looks like BITS beat me to it - sure proof that twisted minds think alike...

rainmaker Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimTaylor
OOPS! Looks like BITS beat me to it - sure proof that twisted minds think alike...

yup

Now that the test is over, the courts are once again safe? I don't follow that thinking at all!! I can name several people who undoubtedly passed who are clearly NOT safe on the court.

I hate that thing! But it was fun to sit and chat. And I was so busy blabbing, I didn't ask how your kids are.

M&M Guy Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
How about Ms. Annoying Grammar Gal? :D

Umm, not meaning to be sexist or anything, but how are we supposed to use that squirrel picture for a Ms. Annoying Grammar Gal? :eek:

Dan_ref Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Umm, not meaning to be sexist or anything, but how are we supposed to use that squirrel picture for a Ms. Annoying Grammar Gal? :eek:

Don't you support diversity?

M&M Guy Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Don't you support diversity?

Interesting how you use the term "support" when I refer to that squirrel...

Dan_ref Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Interesting how you use the term "support" when I refer to that squirrel...

Hey! What am I inferring by that remark??!

M&M Guy Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Hey! What am I inferring by that remark??!

Damn if I know... :D

But just imagine the fun we can have picking out a suitable Ms. Grammar Gal picture.

Dan_ref Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Damn if I know... :D

But just imagine the fun we can have picking out a suitable Ms. Grammar Gal picture.

I dunno...it aint easy to find risque pictures on the internet (not that I've tried, that's only what I hear from JR).

Jurassic Referee Wed Nov 22, 2006 07:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Damn if I know... :D

But just imagine the fun we can have picking out a suitable Ms. Grammar Gal picture.

http://www.comedy-zone.net/pictures/.../animal020.jpg

BktBallRef Wed Nov 22, 2006 08:51am

I'm not calling 5 seconds unless there is a defender actively guarding the player with the ball. Just because another player is standing within 6 feet, it does not mean that the 2nd defender is actually guarding or even knows what's going on.

Ref Daddy Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef
I'm not calling 5 seconds unless there is a defender actively guarding the player with the ball. Just because another player is standing within 6 feet, it does not mean that the 2nd defender is actually guarding or even knows what's going on.

Best thought provoking thread of the young season.

I'm with BBR. If the player is effectivly "passed off" to a focused-on-that-player defender, keep counting. Just because a post player is within 6 feet and chasing somebody else - I cannot see a penalty.

Smitty Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:00am

The 5 second count continuing from one defender to another is more prevalent in the case of a screen. When a defensive switch occurs immediately after the primary defender has been screened, and a new deffender obtains legal guarding position inside 6 feet immediately, I keep my count going.

legend Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:25am

I'd use caution with this call if the dribbler is driving to the hoop. If your on 5 and the dribbler's next step is to start a shot attempt I would think he should be allowed the oppertunity to attempt the shot. If he passes then blow it dead with the 5 sec. violation. We all know it's better to be late then early!

TimTaylor Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:45am

BBR & Ref Daddy make a good point. In order for the 5 second count to continue, the 2nd defender must establish LGP on the offensive player before it is terminated with the 1st defender - otherwise he gets a new 5 second count. As Smitty said, this happens most commonly in the event of a screen - other common situation it can occur is when there's a double team.

Adam Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:00pm

He doesn't need to have LGP. He only needs to be guarding the player with the ball; which does not require LGP.

rainmaker Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

not bad, but the ears are a little high. I like the fuzzy, round effect, though....


Wait a minute....

I certainly hope she's not holding .... Are you implying (I'm inferring) that I have ever......

I'm shocked!!

Shocked, I tell you!! I'm just glad my poor sainted grandmother isn't around to see this. If she weren't dead, it would kill her!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1