Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
They apply in the world "I" live in, and that is the only world I am concerned with. |
Uh...(with raised hand) when did professionalism - other than how you carry yourself during a game - and ethics become part of officiating? This is pretty entertaining actually.
It seems like no credit was given for those who don't take this test as a closed book exam. Also, credit wasn't given to those who don't take the test at all. Finally, credit wasn't given for those who are too lazy :D to do the test. I got the test early and finished it without problem so I don't care one way or the other. Yes, I can see where ethics and professionalism should apply to the test and I agree 100%. However, it is laughable to apply those standards to one part of officiating when they are not applied across the board. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
I mean it is expected of us on the court, but that is where that expectation ends.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OK, you guys both have good points so let me correct myself and say that unethical things are done all the time in the officiating world as a whole. You guys are both right about officials' conduct, but that isn't what I had in mind.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Underdressing is not unethical. Perhaps unprofessional, but not unethical. Plus the manner of dress says absolutely nothing about the ability or character of the person. Submitting answers to a test obtained in a manner not in line with the intentions of the testing body is unethical...its cheating. For example, If the organization administering the tests expects to hand out the test and have it's members take it on the spot, it would be unethical for any of those members to obtain the test or its answers prior to that time. It would also be unethical for someone to knowingly provide such a person with the test or its answers. These principles are not variable or subjective. They are the basic to the definitions or honor and integrity. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41am. |