foul out and free throws with a T

[JRutledge]

I will never understand why people are so invested in what I think about this rule. This conversation is based on a find that most people have not seen. This is why I asked my interpreter and I wanted his take. This is not even a likely situation in the first place.

Many here sound like a bunch of Jehovah Witnesses debating religious expression.

Peace

[ChuckElias]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Many here sound like a bunch of Jehovah Witnesses debating religious expression.

That's not how Jehovah's Witnesses sound when they debate religious expression around here. In fact, it's very unlikely that you'd ever hear them debating religious expression, so why are you so concerned about what they sound like? I'm going to email my pastor and ask him what Jehovah's Witnesses sound like, but I won't tell him that they're debating religious expression. If you want a copy of the email that I get back from him, let me know.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ChuckElias

That's not how Jehovah's Witnesses sound when they debate religious expression around here. In fact, it's very unlikely that you'd ever hear them debating religious expression, so why are you so concerned about what they sound like? I'm going to email my pastor and ask him what Jehovah's Witnesses sound like, but I won't tell him that they're debating religious expression. If you want a copy of the email that I get back from him, let me know.

It explains a lot.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I will never understand why people are so invested in what I think about this rule. This conversation is based on a find that most people have not seen. This is why I asked my interpreter and I wanted his take. This is not even a likely situation in the first place.

Many here sound like a bunch of Jehovah Witnesses debating religious expression.

Peace

We're not so concerned about what YOU think about the rule. We just want to prevent the spread of the ignorance that you exude.

[Camron Rust]

I just thought of something....

If the clarifications on 4-23 were not completely reprinted this year, I can interpret "playing court" to mean the area OOB and allow a defender to plant a foot on the live to cut off a dribbler while being able to draw a charge!!!

[Rick Durkee]

I ran this by the folks at IAABO. (Well, the original question, not the other garbage in this thread.) You don't need to remind me that IAABO is not the authority, but I figured their position on the matter counted as much as any of ours. They believe that the points stand and that this is not a correctable error.

[BayStateRef]

I emailed Kurt and gave him all the information, including the 2000-01 Fed interpretation.

His response, in full:

"Thanks for the note. My interpretation is that the correctable error rule is the rule in question and not 4-14-2."

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by BayStateRef

I emailed Kurt and gave him all the information, including the 2000-01 Fed interpretation.

His response, in full:

"Thanks for the note. My interpretation is that the correctable error rule is the rule in question and not 4-14-2."

Can I get an interpretation of what he is saying?

Is he still going with his original ruling that it's still a correctable error, despite the previous NFHS ruling?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BayStateRef

I emailed Kurt and gave him all the information, including the 2000-01 Fed interpretation.

His response, in full:

"Thanks for the note. My interpretation is that the correctable error rule is the rule in question and not 4-14-2."

With this kind of thinking from the leadership in Illinois, I can understand why Rut is so screwed up.

I can respect that Kurt doesn't personally agree with the official NFHS interpretation of this play, but he needs to state that until he is able to work with the NFHS committee to get it changed that ruling and NOT his personal interpretation is controlling and is what should be followed by officials.

He is not more important than the NFHS.

[JRutledge]

Nevada,

You are right. We should all bow down to the NF and anything they want. No dissention what so ever or suffer severe consequences. Sounds a lot like the Nazis and Communist governments from where I am standing.

Peace