![]() |
Hand Checking guidelines
The GPBOA website ( http://www.gpboa.org/Rules%20&%20Mechanics.htm )has some good articles for beginning officials.
One in particular is regarding hand checking, and was written by John Basorist, a D1 official in Michigan. The full article is at http://www.gpboa.org/Articles/Handchecking.pdf but the gist of the article is : Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My personal opinion: I think it takes away some of the judgement involved in the call. For example - two hands on an opponent is a foul. But what if A1 came right at the defender, and B1 puts up their hands as a reaction and A1 contacts both hands. You have to call the foul. But there's also no rules basis for calling it; your explanation to the coach is that's how your association told you to call it. At least in NCAA-W, the guidelines are in the rule book, and when we call it the coach has no basis for a complaint because it's written right there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also these do look like NCAA Women's guidelines. I would not use these in boy’s varsity games. Peace |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
The article does kind of contradict itself a little. On one line, it says officials "have the misconception that "I'll call it if it impedes the ball handler". But this is not the direction referees are encouraged to follow." Then it says, "Incidental contact with the hand(s) that does not impede the progress of the ball handler is NOT illegal." I still think NFHS wants the judgement in there. Maybe we as officials aren't doing a good enough job in calling when it should be called. But I don't think they're ready to put in specific guidelines yet. |
Quote:
Peace |
Dang it Chuck, you type faster than me!
However, I will disagree with your coughing spell. This is directly out of NCAA-W as well - armbars are legal on a post player with their back to the basket, as long as there is no displacement. However, armbars are not allowed on a ball-handler away from the basket, and once the post player has the ball and turns to face the basket, the armbar must come off. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
You really have been keeping up on the WNBA! :D Wasn't Dee originally the supervisor in the beginning as well? |
Quote:
The FED has already issued guidelines. Several times. The most recent one iirc was in the 2003-04 rule book. <b>POE 2A- HANDCHECKING:</b> <i>1) Any tactic using the hands, arms or body that allows a player, on offense or defense, to "control"(hold, impede, push, divert, slow or prevent) the movement of an opponent is a foul. 2) When an offensive player uses his or her hands or body to push-off for position, for spacing, for getting open to receive a pass or to move the ball via pass or dribble, it is a foul. 3) "Hooking" by the offensive players should be presumed a definite advantage. This is not a judgement call or tactic worthy of a warning. It is a foul and should be called without hesitation. 4) Any act or tactic of illegal use of the hands, arms or body(offense or defense) that intentionally slows, prevents, impedes the progress or displaces an opposing player due to the contact is a foul and must be called. 5) Regardless of where it takes place on the floor, when a player continuosly places a hand on an opposing player, it is a foul. 6) When a player jabs a hand or forearm on an opponent, it is a foul.</i> Also from a POE the previous year: 1) No displacement of a cutter 2) The measuring up of an opponent(tagging) is hand checking, is not permitted, and is a foul. 3) Use of a forearm, regardless of the duration of the contact, is a foul. As you already know,M, NCAA Men and Wimmen set out their own guidelines in the appendices immediately following R10 in the NCAA rule book. When in doubt, use the rule book. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Peace |
JR - you're right about the NFHS guidelines listed. Maybe I wasn't specific about my specificity?
All of the items you list still have a measure of judgement to them - any tactic used to "control", for example, or words such as "tactic...that intentionally slows, prevents, impedes the progress or displaces an opposing player due to the contact". I was just trying to point out there should still be judgement involved in the call. I was responding to the real specific items, such as "any two hands on an opponent", for example. I do also have to point out a little inconsistancy on your part. You made the comment, "Jim, I would ignore those guidelines completely for NFHS. Several of them are just plain wrong, including the armbars and "tagging" a defender." Well, in your previous post regarding a POE from a previous year: 2) The measuring up of an opponent(tagging) is hand checking, is not permitted, and is a foul. So there. :p So, I'm not saying there shouldn't be guidelines, just not real specific ones like the ones listed that seem to take away the judgement. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20pm. |