The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   NBA Refs miss 5% of calls - David Stern (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/26357-nba-refs-miss-5-calls-david-stern.html)

Jimgolf Wed May 03, 2006 09:10am

NBA Refs miss 5% of calls - David Stern
 
I guess you'll have to read this to believe it:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns

Jurassic Referee Wed May 03, 2006 09:47am

Must be improving. I've read several press releases from the NBA head office in the last few years that had quoted a league average of 7% misses on calls.

Nate1224hoops Wed May 03, 2006 09:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimgolf
I guess you'll have to read this to believe it:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns


You don't agree with this. I would like to think that this is about right. By Stern saying "our officials miss about 5% of the calls," it sounds negative. But what if he had said "our officials are correct about 95% percent of the time. That sounds different. To say that anyone is correct about anything 95% of the time is a big statement. I would actually think it would be less in the NBA...lol. Take for instance the "spectacular move" that TNT kept showing of Labron James where he went up in the air with Haywood and held the ball til the last second before making the basket. HE WALKED WALKED WALKED. He took 2 to many steps. I think that Stern was refferring to the times when the officials DO blow the whistle, but they missing calls includes more than just the ones you call.

Ref_ Fred Wed May 03, 2006 10:09am

NBA misses 5% of calls
 
If they want to achieve 100%, they better start thinking of 5 Officials on the court.. LOL

Junker Wed May 03, 2006 10:59am

I've seen statistics like this and really I think they're crap. I don't care how many different camera angles you look at, there is no way for certain to tell if an official is 95% correct. It's not like we're calculating batting averages or shooting statistics. There are too many different game situations etc. to give a statistical number to correct calls. More imporantly to me would be whether or not my partners felt I worked a solid game, my assignor felt I worked a solid game, and to a lesser degree that the players and coaches felt I worked a solid game.

WhistlesAndStripes Wed May 03, 2006 11:12am

And the fans think it's more....
 
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sports...ion16285=66639

Note question #6.

eiguaram55ref Wed May 03, 2006 12:06pm

every teams always wants to advance for the playoffs----that;s why they
intimidate,blaming officials--SCAPEGOATING!!! NBA REFEREES ARE THE BEST
IN THE UNIVERSE,NEVER INTIMIDATE,!keep up the good work!!!!

eiguaram55ref Wed May 03, 2006 12:08pm

every teams always wants to advance for the playoffs----that's why they
intimidate,blaming officials--SCAPEGOATING!!! NBA REFEREES ARE THE BEST
IN THE UNIVERSE,NEVER INTIMIDATE,!keep up the good work!!!!

Ref_ Fred Wed May 03, 2006 12:14pm

Quote:

More imporantly to me would be whether or not my partners felt I worked a solid game, my assignor felt I worked a solid game, and to a lesser degree that the players and coaches felt I worked a solid game.
As much as I look for the approval of the Coaches and Players most of the time. Even my assignor, It's that one call they felt I should have made that they remember and sticks out most and then they give you a bad review. In general we have been doing this for many years, your crew will be honest to let you know if you've done a good job. My partner is who I look for. You hope!

ChuckElias Wed May 03, 2006 01:52pm

I think Stern should fine himself $25k for these comments. :D

Jurassic Referee Wed May 03, 2006 02:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChuckElias
I think Stern should fine himself $25k for these comments. :D

For an extra $10,000, he could get to grab Chris Kaman's nuts.:eek:

Still trying to figger out why that one ain't worthy of a suspenion......

BBall_Junkie Wed May 03, 2006 02:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
For an extra $10,000, he could get to grab Chris Kaman's nuts.:eek:

Still trying to figger out why that one ain't worthy of a suspenion......

Agreed. "Testicle Fouls" should always be flagrant :D

M&M Guy Wed May 03, 2006 02:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBall_Junkie
Agreed. "Testicle Fouls" should always be flagrant :D

Groan...

I just don't don't have the balls to say something <B>that</B> bad.

rockyroad Wed May 03, 2006 02:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBall_Junkie
Agreed. "Testicle Fouls" should always be flagrant :D

I'm wondering (only slightly, mind you) what the approved NFHS signal would be for a "testicle foul". Yuck...

I'm sure Dan or JR or M7M have some clip-art picture they can supply, but I'm not really sure I want to see it.

Stripes33 Wed May 03, 2006 03:02pm

I don't doubt the ability of these offcials but until they stop catering to the superstars and call things as they happen it will never improve. Giving veterans or stars extra steps or overlooking fouls is no way improve there image. I will give them credit for finally starting to call the fouls on Shaq that should have been called since he came into the league. They need to ignore the who the players are and concentrate more on the game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1