Wed Mar 15, 2006, 10:48am
|
|
In Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BadNewsRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by BadNewsRef
just a question, if the shoe fits, wear it.
But why is it alright for we officials to judge whether or not someone is a good coach but coaches get lit up in this forum if they criticize or pass judgement on a referee?
|
I get it.
You think that we should give coaches the benefit of the doubt.
But, as per the Kentucky thread, you don't think that we should give a fellow official the benefit of the doubt.
If the shoe fits, wear it.....indeed. 
|
No, I'm saying "how are we qualified to judge the abililties of a coach?" That has nothing to do with benefit of the doubt. This forum takes a very harsh tone with coaches who criticize officials, yet everyday I read sermons in here from officials to coaches on what is or isn't good coaching.
As for the KY situation, I did give the benefit of the doubt to an official, the one named Montgomery. As I said previously, Bailey starts out in the negative side of the ledger for being in the locker room when he should not have been.
|
Yup...indeed....
I know exactly what you're saying.
|
Hybrid Mode
