|
|||
In hopes that others don't blow it as I did tonight - not that the coaches or crowd disagreed, here was a case where getting it wrong got me off easier - I had the girl-on-ground has ball between legs, in this case thigh high, and opponent is trying to wrestle it away situation.
Reacting, I believe, to the . . . ahem . . . intimacy of the situation, I was pretty quick with the whistle, but called a held ball where, I do believe, kick is more better righter. Held ball (4-25-1) stipulates using hands. Kick (4-29), the most recent incarnation of kick, specifies intentionally striking the ball with any part of the leg or foot. Squeezing it with the thighs is TWO kicks at once, in opposite directions . . .
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
|
|||
What?
A ball held between a players legs is considered a kick ball? Really? Can someone supply case and point, please? Thanks.
__________________
All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things. |
|
|||
Quote:
[Edited by assignmentmaker on Feb 11th, 2006 at 11:26 AM]
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
|
|||
Re: What?
Quote:
I'm on the side of the people who would call it a violation. I think that the purpose and intent of the rules is to have the game played with the hands and not the legs or the feet. And....as you posted in the linked thread below, you will find the following in "Naismith's Original 13 Rules": #4- "The ball must be held in or between the hands; the arms or body must not be used for holding it". Whointhehell am I to argue with Naismith? http://www.officialforum.com/thread/24810 |
|
|||
Re: Re: What?
Quote:
__________________
All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things. |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: What?
Quote:
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
|
|||
Quote:
Personally, if I can't find anything in the book that will back up myself if I do call a violation on this play, then I ain't gonna call that violation.....and I say that while thinking personally that it really should be a violation. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Here you go ladies and gents:
Basketball NCAA Rule 4: Definitions Section 43: Kicking the Ball - Article 2 Accidentally striking the ball with the foot or leg shall not be a violation. A.R. 30. A1 is on the floor with the ball lodged between the upper part of the legs. B1 attempts to gain possession of the ball by placing two hands firmly on the ball; however, A1 applies vice-like force with the upper legs, which prevents B1 from gaining possession of the ball. RULING: A1 has committed a violation. The intent of this Rule is to prevent a player from gaining an advantage by using any part of the leg. Although A1 did not kick or strike the ball with any part of the leg, the player did gain an illegal advantage, which may also lead to undue roughness. Since A1 was not holding the ball in his or her hands, B1's firm placement of his or her hands on the ball does not constitute a held ball. |
|
|||
No! I had this play earlier in the year where A1 was on the floor on her back with the ball 6 inches below her feet. She stretched and picked it up with her feet...then tossed it up to her hands (with her feet) and made an outlet pass to A2. It was a very athletic play but unfortunately a kicked ball. No one from B made a play on the ball.
|
|
|||
Quote:
As a thought experiment, how would you - FED rules - handle a player sitting unintentionally on the ball? 5-second closely guarded limit in the frontcourt . . . 10-seconds in the backcourt . . . 3-seconds in the lane? I have never had this happen - but it doesn't strike me as THAT farfetched.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
Bookmarks |
|
|