The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 12
I don't work college ball but I am trying to understand the differences between NCAA and NFHS. Last night in the Duke/Va Tech game, Duke's Point Guard, Paulus, drove to the hoop, got fouled and then the Va Tech defender who fouled him, pushed Paulus and was assessed a T. The way it was administered was as follows: Paulus shot two shots (presumably the two he earned for being fouled), and then Redick shot two shots (presumably the technical free throws). I thought that NCAA technicals are assessed at the Point of Interruption, so my thought was that the Technical free throws would have come before the free throws for the shots. Just want to clear up my confusion. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 09:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
The technical foul for illegal contact on the VT player is a intentional technical foul that results in two FTS and the ball for Duke. That's why the FTs for the personal foul were shot first, because Duke got the ball after all the FTs were over.

[Edited by BktBallRef on Jan 27th, 2006 at 10:06 AM]
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 09:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
The technical foul for illegal contact on the VT player is a direct technical foul that results in two FTS and the ball for Duke. That's why the FTs for the personal foul were shot first, because Duke got the ball after all the FTs were over.
When Tony says "Direct", I think he means "Intentional"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 09:18am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Based on my Sportcenter view of the play, that appeared to be:

Rule 10 Section 13 Art. 3. A flagrant contact technical foul is severely or excessively contacting
an opponent when the ball is dead.

which would be penalized as follows:
Rule 10 Section 14 Art. 1. The penalty for a flagrant technical foul shall be two free throws
awarded to a player of the offended team and possession of the ball to
the offended team at a designated spot at the division line.
Art. 2. The offender(s) shall be ejected.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 09:19am
MABO Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MB, Canada
Posts: 796
My understanding in NCAA was that the ball would get awarded to the offended team if a flagrant technical foul or Intentional Technical foul was called.

too slow...LOL

[Edited by SmokeEater on Jan 27th, 2006 at 09:21 AM]
__________________
"Your Azz is the Red Sea, My foot is Moses, and I am about to part the Red Sea all the way up to my knee!"

All references/comments are intended for educational purposes. Opinions are free.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally posted by Largent
Last night in the Duke/Va Tech game, Duke's Point Guard, Paulus, drove to the hoop, got fouled and then the Va Tech defender who fouled him, pushed Paulus and was assessed a T.
Uhm thats NOT what happened.

VATech guard Washington drove to the hoop and was fouled (block) by Melchionni of Duke. As the two players were tangled up under the basket, Washington KICKED Melchionni in the face! It was ruled (correctly) a flagrant contact technical foul and he was ejected. Some poor schmuck who has attempted all of 8 free throws all year for VA shot the two shots for Washington and then Reddick shot two for the T. The T was administered correctly as this was a dead ball situation.




The officials released a statement afterward saying, through replay, they determined the kick was a "combative action" and the matter will be reviewed by the league office. Greenberg said he's not ready to say if he'll take additional action.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
ummmmm yeah it was

Quote:
Originally posted by eyezen
Quote:
Originally posted by Largent
Last night in the Duke/Va Tech game, Duke's Point Guard, Paulus, drove to the hoop, got fouled and then the Va Tech defender who fouled him, pushed Paulus and was assessed a T.
Uhm thats NOT what happened.

Eyezen, you must not have watched the whole game or something...what the guys are talking about above did happen as well as your situation....
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Your right. I didn't watch the whole game only the second half, just got back from my own early game and and sat down to watch... My mistake and I apologize, I didn't read about that sit. in the recap.

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 27, 2006, 12:37pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
This was a Flagrant Technical Foul. This kind of T is not handled as any other T. This would be two shoots and the ball at the Division line (just like it used to be for all Ts).

I do not know where anyone is getting classification of "Direct" or "Indirect." This was not a just a conduct foul. This was a foul that was committed by kicking an opponent (VT player kicking the Duke Player in the face). The officials applied this properly.

Look at page 168 in the NCAA Book where the chart states what should be done.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1