Originally posted by Nevadaref
Funny how both calls are clearly justified by the rules, but he only labels one of them as horrible.
My point was only that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. What some dislike others may like and vice versa. Perhaps he should be more concerned with his own decisions than those of his partner.
Gotta agree with that.
How come though that concept doesn't also hold true if, say, a personal foul and an intentional personal foul can also both be justified by the rules on the same play? You know....what some dislike others may like and vice versa? "Spain that to me, Batman.
If you go check that other thread, I concurred with you on this. Never meant to imply that I didn't.