|
|||
Hey guys just a quick one. A1 has the ball in the front court then B1 tips it into the backcourt. A1 gets the ball in the backcourt. Over and back???? also what if A2 gets the ball Over and Back????
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Would you give the tipped sign to let everyone know you saw there was contact or not? I almost always do unless it is blatantly obvious.
__________________
That's my whistle -- and I'm sticking to it! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
...unless as T I look at P needing information, or vice versa. I know it's not "authorized" but it's useful and prevents a lot of difficulty. So sue me. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Sports do not build character. They reveal it" - Heywood H. Broun "Officiating does not build character. It reveal's it" - Ref Daddy |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
So by following this new rule if A1 has the ball in the front court, B1 tips it back off A1's leg and it goes back court as soon as any A memeber touches it, it is over and back?
|
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, it's a backcourt violation. An A player was the last to touch it in the frontcourt...and an A player was the first to touch it in the backcourt. |
|
|||
Quote:
I believe the controversial part was A's intent. One version was if A intended the ball to go back to the BC, and was the first to touch it, it is a violation. If there was no intent, no violation. The other flavour was taking out the intent, making it the rule we know now.
__________________
Pope Francis |
Bookmarks |
|
|