SEC Supervisor Ousted

[JRutledge]

Originally posted by tomegun

At this point, I concur too!

At this point who really gives a damn?

Peace

[Dan_ref]

Originally posted by ChuckElias

What is this? Cuba? I can't even yawn anymore? Just because they don't yawn in your part of the country doesn't have any effect on how people yawn in my part of the country. If you don't want to yawn, fine. But last time I checked, this was a discussion forum. If you don't want to discuss my yawn, then just don't reply.

Sorry about that. I'll send you a donut to make up for it.

Whether people yawn or not in my area has nothing to do with the fact that I could care less when you yawn. It doesn't matter to me if you yawn or not but this is a discussion forum and if you don't want me to discuss yawning you should not post your yawns. I know many big-time yawners and even though I'm not myself on the cusp of getting on a D1 yawning staff I can say that you have your opinion and I have my opinion and your yawns do not make a difference to me in my life.

[Jurassic Referee]

[BktBallRef]

Originally posted by JRutledge
That all might be true Tony, but in the area I live what the SEC does is not really going to change what happens with the Big Ten or what the mid-major basketball conferences do. If you only work in the SEC or the lower level conferences that feed into the SEC, you will be affected. Now that is just my opinion.

Sorry but just because you say it doesn't make it true. The Big 10 could easily be affected.

1- The new SEC supervisor could come from the officiating staff of the Big 10. That would affect the Big 10.

2- The new supervisor could recurit officials that currently work in the Big 10 to the SEC. That would affect the Big 10.

So yes, what happens in the SEC could affect the Big 10, whether you agree or not.

[BktBallRef]

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Whether people yawn or not in my area has nothing to do with the fact that I could care less when you yawn. It doesn't matter to me if you yawn or not but this is a discussion forum and if you don't want me to discuss yawning you should not post your yawns. I know many big-time yawners and even though I'm not myself on the cusp of getting on a D1 yawning staff I can say that you have your opinion and I have my opinion and your yawns do not make a difference to me in my life.

YAWN!

[ChuckElias]

Originally posted by Dan_ref
I know many big-time yawners and even though I'm not myself on the cusp of getting on a D1 yawning staff I can say that you have your opinion and I have my opinion and your yawns do not make a difference to me in my life.

This rant is much better than my rant. This actually made me laugh out loud. Have a donut on me.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

JR, I always figgred you'd have more wrinkles. But both you, and your frock look freshly pressed.

[JRutledge]

Originally posted by BktBallRef


Sorry but just because you say it doesn't make it true. The Big 10 could easily be affected.

1- The new SEC supervisor could come from the officiating staff of the Big 10. That would affect the Big 10.

2- The new supervisor could recurit officials that currently work in the Big 10 to the SEC. That would affect the Big 10.

So yes, what happens in the SEC could affect the Big 10, whether you agree or not.

I do not recall that I said it would or would not affect them, I asked how it would affect the nation? I still have not heard an answer that shows that it will affect the nation as suggested. All I have heard is hyperbole and speculation. Based on what I know it is unlikely this will have that much affect. Of course it will possibly change a few people, but I do not see it making that much of an impact (sue me for having an opinion). And after all, nothing that we say here is going to make a hill of beans when it is all said and done. No one is going to care what any of us think or why we think the way we do. The SEC is going to do what is best for the SEC, not what is best for those here.

Peace

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle

JR, I always figgred you'd have more wrinkles. But both you, and your frock look freshly pressed.

Get pressed.

Iow, frock you too.

[jbduke]

Originally posted by BktBallRef

Sorry but just because you say it doesn't make it true. The Big 10 could easily be affected.

1- The new SEC supervisor could come from the officiating staff of the Big 10. That would affect the Big 10.

2- The new supervisor could recurit officials that currently work in the Big 10 to the SEC. That would affect the Big 10.

So yes, what happens in the SEC could affect the Big 10, whether you agree or not.

Tony,

Don't let an airtight argument get in the way of me not giving a damn.

[PGCougar]

I'm guessing this thread has reached a point where someone should be shouting, "Shut up!"

Anyone else agree???

[IREFU2]

Originally posted by PGCougar
I'm guessing this thread has reached a point where someone should be shouting, "Shut up!"

Anyone else agree???

Yep, sounds like it may happen soon!

[Jurassic Referee]

Nonononononoooooo.........

Leave the thread alone....

[Dan_ref]

Originally posted by ChuckElias

This rant is much better than my rant. This actually made me laugh out loud. Have a donut on me.

yawn...

[RefNVa]

A source close to the situation tells me that 30+/- officials will be affected, quite a ripple in the Force Luke!