|
|
|
Thu Dec 01, 2005, 12:17pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think this is more of a case where someone did not say, "Oh, oh we have a problem."
By definition B1 is OOB, so under the rules both cases should now be a violation for leaving the floor. The case book has not caught up with the new rule and the last new rule. That said, there is no justification for using one illegal act to allow another. 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
