|
|
|
Thu Dec 01, 2005, 12:15pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is not the first time our interpreter has come up with an interpretation that is, well, stretching the limits. Personally, I am not bothered by this interp compared to some of the others he has stated.
Now, do you consider the case 4.23.3 sitB to be wrong - should it be a violation instead of a foul?
__________________
I only wanna know ... 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
