Question #21 & #89

tjones1 · #1 (**permalink**) Sat Nov 19, 2005, 02:53pm

Can someone please tell me these questions. I left my exam at my apartment and I'm home for the holidays. These two questions the IHSA threw out. Just wondering what they were, thanks!

Jurassic Referee · #2 (**permalink**) Sat Nov 19, 2005, 04:31pm

NFHS Part 1? If so....

#21:"Point of Interruption" is a method of resuming play after a double personal ot technical foul"
- The answer key says "True" as per R4-36-1. This is one that we discussed in another thread as to whether they meant the "technical foul" to be a double or single technical foul. It is a l'il ambiguous.

#89-"If a players shirt is not properly tucked inside the pants, the official shall direct him or her to leave the game unless the team is subsequently granted a time-out"
- We discussed this one also in a thread. The answer key said "False" as per 3-4-15. R3-3-4 seemed to be applicable also. I don't know why this one got tossed but there musta been a reason.

co2ice · #3 (**permalink**) Sat Nov 19, 2005, 06:22pm

If you look 5 8 3b it makes 89 very clear that a T.O. is not to be granted until a player asked too leave or disqualified or injured has been replaced. Its clear to me, I wonder why it was thrown as well.

BktBallRef · #4 (**permalink**) Sat Nov 19, 2005, 06:50pm

Quote:

Originally posted by co2ice
If you look 5 8 3b it makes 89 very clear that a T.O. is not to be granted until a player asked too leave or disqualified or injured has been replaced. Its clear to me, I wonder why it was thrown as well.

Exactly. Once he's directed to leave the game, a substitute must enter before a TO can be granted.

tjones1 · #5 (**permalink**) Sun Nov 20, 2005, 01:12pm

Not sure why they threw them out either. I got them both correct. A higher percentage must of missed the question, therefore maybe they thought the question was confusing. Who knows... Thanks for posting the questions.