NFHS question 21

[BktBallRef]

Originally posted by roadking
true, but thats what confusing about the question it does not say double technical. i believe it to be false by nfhs letter of the rule.

The answer is TRUE.

If they had meant it the way you're interpreting it, it would have read,

"Point of interuption is a method of resuming play after a double personal FOUL or A technical foul."

The fact that the statement doesn't include FOUL or A makes the statement TRUE.

"Point of interuption is a method of resuming play after a double personal or technical foul," meaning that the words double and foul extend to the conjunctive phrase "personal or technical."