The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 24, 2005, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
A1 throwing ball in, it hits rim and is bouncing around on rim, B1 jumps and hits ball in cylinder???? Count 2 points for Team A for basket interference on throw in TRUE OR FALSE?? can Team A score from a throw in, i'm thinking i read this last year and it said you give A 2 pts and give ball to team B for throw in, just making sure
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 24, 2005, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by jritchie
A1 throwing ball in, it hits rim and is bouncing around on rim, B1 jumps and hits ball in cylinder???? Count 2 points for Team A for basket interference on throw in TRUE OR FALSE?? can Team A score from a throw in, i'm thinking i read this last year and it said you give A 2 pts and give ball to team B for throw in, just making sure
True. You can't "score" on a throw-in, but points can be awarded for BI.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 24, 2005, 01:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
Think that rule should be looked at!!!

i think you should just call BI and give the ball back to team A OOB!!! but i don't make the rules, i'm just supposed to enforce them!! i don't see what the reasoning is behind giving them the pts from the throw in being interfered with!! If it goes in it's a violation, so i just think giving them the pts is going a little far...i think it would be better just giving them a throw in over!! It doesn't happen hardly at all probably, does anyone know any reasoning behind this decision???? yes i'm bored and was just looking through the manual at crazy plays that hardly ever happen....because heaven knows anything can and will happen when you least expect it!!
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 24, 2005, 02:23pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: Think that rule should be looked at!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by jritchie
i think you should just call BI and give the ball back to team A OOB!!!
That's called double jeopardy or the punishment not really fitting the crime. If you do that, you're penalizing team B twice. Once by awarding team A 2 points for the BI-- and once by taking away the normal throw-in by team B after a made or awarded basket.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 24, 2005, 03:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
I think he meant that you wouldn't count the basket, but you would blow the whistle, call the violation signally no basket (I guess) and then award A a throw in.

Nice idea, but I'm not sure there is rules support for that.

(Unless there's an approved ruling to the contrary,) I believe you count the basket just as you would if a throw in pass gets deflected by Team B into the basket. There intervening violation changes the play. Now: what if the same throw in gets deflected by Team A into the basket?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 24, 2005, 03:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally posted by Texas Aggie

(Unless there's an approved ruling to the contrary,) I believe you count the basket just as you would if a throw in pass gets deflected by Team B into the basket. There intervening violation changes the play. Now: what if the same throw in gets deflected by Team A into the basket?
In either of these two sitch's, doesn't the throw-in end when the ball is touched by a player on the court? So, wouldn't the basket count in either case, because it's now a live ball in-bounds?

Also, jritchie, don't think of the points as a basket being scored, rather it is points being awarded because of B1's violation.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 25, 2005, 07:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
yes i was talking about not counting the pts and just giving team A back the ball...just seems like a severe penalty when they don't supposed to be able to score anyways...i know the rule says to award 2 pts, i was just wondering if the violation fits the crime??
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1