|
|||
#59 In setting a stationary screen,team A has four players get down on all fours as in a football stance. Official rules this is not a legal position in setting a screen, Is the official correct?
(does anybody else have the "IAABO Refresher Exam-2005?) |
|
|||
Quote:
If that isn't the most moronic question ever put on an exam, it has to be in the top 5 anyway. For the life of me, I can't see any value at all in posing a question like that. It's a play that you just aren't gonna ever see or have to rule on. Yoohoo, Chuck? 'Sup with this? |
|
|||
Quote:
Is that a legal position to set a screen? Gotta have a rules citation with your answer, of course. Would it be a legal position if the four teammates laid down on their backs with their arms and legs in the air and barked? Or is that the next question on the exam? C'mon, Chuck. You gotta write this exam, don't you? Why won't you come out and play? PS- I think I know the correct answer. [Edited by Jurassic Referee on Oct 15th, 2005 at 12:24 PM] |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I am glad that everyone who has replied is so smug and so arrogant and so sure of their rules knowledge that they feel no need to actually answer the question. Refresher exams often pose seemingly silly or unlikely-in-real-life scenarios. Yet, there isn't a season that goes by where I do not encounter some wierd, strange or obscure play that involves a complete knowledge of the rules as well as the confidence to tell the coach that despite "never having seen that call in 20 years," it is indeed correct by rule..
But then I do not have the luxury of picking all my assignments, so I don't always have AAAA state champion games played above the rim, by well-coached teams with great body control and outstanding basketball skills. Sometimes, it's a 5th grade girls travel game where ponytails may actually touch out of bounds while they are holding the ball inbounds. As for the specific question, I cannot find anything that makes this "screen" illegal. Assuming all the other rules for a legal screen are met (no contact, distance, time, stationary and, in the frontcourt, not controling the ball for 5 seconds behind the screening teammates), I have nothing. Of course, to reach this opinion, I had to look up a number of rules and definitions -- which presumably is the point of the review question. |
|
|||
Quote:
I also agree that IAABO refresher exams post silly and unlikely rules scenarios. They should, however, post questions that do have a definitive rules answer. This question is stoopid. It does NOT have a definitive answer. It doesn't really test anyone's rules knowledge. It's a waste of time. Anybody that thinks differently is smug and arrogant. |
|
|||
Quote:
On the other hand I would say this is illegal based on the fact it violates some of the basic principles of verticality and what is considered to be a legal screen by all the definitions. Also the spirit of the rule is to have a screen upright. I have never seen a screen like this attempted, but if attempted I would not consider it legal. JMO Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Rule 10-6-1 -"A player shall not.....impede the progress of an opponent....by bending the body into other than a normal position".
Is being down on all fours considered a "normal position" to play the game of basketball? Again, this question is completely stoopid. There is NO definitive answer to it. Just opinions. It might make for an interesting discussion on a forum like this, but it has no place on a rules exam. |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm not interested in answering the question. If you want to, go ahead. But don't criticize me just because I think the question is stupid. I'm entitled to that opinion. |
Bookmarks |
|
|