|
|||
When a player fouls out and free throws are awarded, the player must leave before the first free throw correct? Assuming they player is shooting 2.
Just had to make sure I was also asked by my partner this week when I did 7th and 8th grade games this question: If the game is not close toward the end and the teams wanted to get subs in without calling a TO, should we (refs) stop the game and allow them to enter? During a part of the game when there is little to no action. I know it's not legal, but he got feedback from AD's and coaches who would appreciate this. Your thoughts? [Edited by lukealex on Sep 21st, 2005 at 03:01 PM] |
|
|||
Quote:
2)No biggie in ms games usually. Make up a reason to blow your whistle- even if you call it an inadvertant whistle. Let the kids play. |
|
|||
I said assuming shooting 2 because if they are shooting 1 or 1 and 1 it would be obvious, but from your reply it makes more sense to state it how you did. Oh well, I knew what I was talking about.
|
|
|||
Quote:
In ms games, it certainly makes sense to let the kids in to play, even without a timeout. Just make sure they understand it's not like hockey, where they can change on the fly.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Oh yeah, in response to the original post: find a way to let the kid into the game.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Re Item 1
Re Item 1, yes, the player with 5 fouls should be directed to leave immediately.
It's worth remembering that under 3-3-1-c EXCEPTION, "When a player is required by rule to be replaced prior to administering the free throw(s), then all other substitutes who have legally reported may also enter the game."
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
Ha ha. Thud. Like most of my jokes. |
|
|||
Quote:
However, if you screw it up, at least remember to follow this: 2004-05 NFHS Basketball Rules Interpretations SITUATION 3: A1 is fouled by B2 and is awarded two free throws. The foul is B2s fifth foul. The new trail official reports the fifth foul to Team Bs coach. Before a substitute is made, the lead official incorrectly permits A1 to attempt the first free throw. The officials realize the error and huddle to discuss the situation. RULING: The result of the first attempt shall stand. Team Bs head coach shall be notified of B2s disqualification. Once B2 has been replaced, A1 shall attempt the second free throw. COMMENT: This is an officials error and not a correctable-error situation according to Rule 2-10. (2-8-3, 4-14-1, 6-1-2c, 10-5-1d) |
|
|||
Quote:
In situation two: I am all about letting the kids play. However, if the teams have TOs and they want to get subs in they will use the TOs. I am getting a little confused here, it is ok to MISINTERPRET the rules to please AD's and coaches when it benefits them. I really have to work on the political side of my game. Got to please those ADs and coaches, forget my integrity and rules. GOT IT!
__________________
truerookie |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Maybe a better way of thinking of this is to officiate to the level you are working. Lower level games are there so players can gain experience. Also pay attention to the "tone" of a game. You can tell when you are in a gym where people understand that the players need to play and will understand and sometimes even appreciate bending the rules a little to get players in. Personally though, I would never do this after the JH level. Also, I'm not sure you want to think of these situations as "politics". It seems to be more of a game mangagement issue. Show these AD's that you understand the game and the level you are officiating and the "politics" will take care of themselves.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|