The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2001, 01:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 237
Question

Our local rec-league has the following rules concerning a player technical: ( http://fbva-west.org/Pubs/rules.htm )

Technical Fouls (Unsportsmanlike Conduct) & Ejections: Whenever a player receives a technical foul, the player shall be benched for a portion of time to teach better sportsmanship.

Here's the sitch: You have a player (A) who is fouled while in the act of shooting. Player A then drops a couple of obscenities and is rung up for unsportsmanlike conduct. By rule this player shall be benched for a portion of time. Who shoots the throws? I think I know the answer, but would like to hear it from you.

Thanks
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2001, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
I'd say this follows the normal rule for designated FT shooter needing to be replaced (whether for injury, blood rule, DQ, etc). This situation, I would treat as a disqualification, and the sub shoots the free throws.

On a side note, how long is the "period of time," and if not set, who determines it?
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2001, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Since A is not eligible to play until he has served his
sentence then it only makes sense that A's replacement would
shoot the free throws.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2001, 02:12pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Since A is not eligible to play until he has served his
sentence then it only makes sense that A's replacement would
shoot the free throws.
Yeah, that'll work.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2001, 02:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I'd say this follows the normal rule for designated FT shooter needing to be replaced (whether for injury, blood rule, DQ, etc). This situation, I would treat as a disqualification, and the sub shoots the free throws.

On a side note, how long is the "period of time," and if not set, who determines it?
Is this kind of like the penalty box in hockey?????
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2001, 02:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter

On a side note, how long is the "period of time," and if not set, who determines it?
I interpret the "portion of time" to mean that time would have to run off the clock. The player would be allowed to substitute at the next dead ball. The same as we would for any player that must leave the contest due to injury, blood rule, etc....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 25, 2001, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Burns
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter

On a side note, how long is the "period of time," and if not set, who determines it?
I interpret the "portion of time" to mean that time would have to run off the clock. The player would be allowed to substitute at the next dead ball. The same as we would for any player that must leave the contest due to injury, blood rule, etc....
I am surprised they don't define it better. In our county rec department's men's soccer league (a very competitive league with a lot of rough play), a yellow card is accompanied by a 5 minute cooling off period by rule. The penalized team may sub in (unlike for a red card). However, the time is clearly defined in the rule. Good intent on this rule in my book, but bad definition. Should specify a time. If I were you, I would determine a period of time (2 minutes sounds about right to me!) rather than allowing the player right back in. Just my thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 25, 2001, 12:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,051
A Technical in lacrosse is 30 seconds...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 25, 2001, 05:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
[Good intent on this rule in my book, but bad definition. Should specify a time. If I were you, I would determine a period of time (2 minutes sounds about right to me!) rather than allowing the player right back in. Just my thoughts. [/B]
I will mention this to the Board.

Defining the period of time would be beneficial. That way the player, coach, officials and parents would know that the player would have to sit for the specified amount of time to run off the clock.

Well, the officials would know anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1